Especially when as ECT mentions its just a whinge because a certain team lost.
Bias seems to mean they don't give 100% one-eyed support that agrees with my views. So Phil Gould, Ben Ikin, Locky, Wally etc. blowing smoke up the Broncos arse is "unbiased" commentary, and dare some Kiwis not treat them like they are the greatest team in history.
Well......I don't know who you think you're speaking for but I certainly didn't start the thread because the Broncos lost.
I mean......how do the commentators have anything to do with the outcome of the game? :?
As for their perceived bias.....sure it was there, but it didn't really bother me at all, in fact, I expected it.
Kiwi commentators, supporting a Kiwi team, being played in.....gasp!!
New Zealand.
Who would have thought it.
The little brother jealousy and envy from NZ is never too far away.
as a NQ Cowboys fan you would know all about little brother / big brother bitter envy
....yes?
The thread was started because I didn't know who the two Kiwi neanderthals were......it wasn't any Warrior bias that shitted me off. It was just their general piss poor calling of the game. They were all over the shop. In the 1st 10 min they called a Wallace 40/20 a NZ feed.....not realising it was actually a 40/20
.....it only got worse from there
and I found Husband's voice and theatrical pronunciation of players names extremely annoying.
Back to the drawing board for little brother .......
