Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
This is similar nonsense to when pundits were saying Ennis is more suited to origin than Farah because of their play styles.
Ok fair enough, apologies for missing your attempt at sarcasm.
Well it was true. Farah was most valuable as a primary playmaker. He was a better player than Ennis but the latter was more physical which made him better suited to Origin.
Nah man. Farah killed it at origin. Sometimes we tend to outsmart ourselves with these narratives that might sound good in theory but are blatantly incorrect.
I think she may have backfired on you slightly and taken Moses along with Cleary and Luai
No Blues player killed it at Origin during the period Farah and Ennis played.
He was the hooker when they won the series during that QLD dynasty.
www.foxsports.com.au
Thats Paul Vautin FFS!
That he did. For one game.
Cherry picking your sample? Classic LU
I literally said during the QLD dynasty. The point was that he wasn’t considered suitable for origin because of some preconceived ideas and that wasn’t true. NSW were unfortunate that they came up against some of the greatest players the game has ever seen at one time.
