Swiftstylez
Bench
- Messages
- 2,858
You might not realise this, but that is actually further evidence that is a comedy thread.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_ridicule
You might not realise this, but that is actually further evidence that is a comedy thread.
I always liked reddy. No frills, very solid dependable player
But f**k its hard to keep liking him when an imbecile keeps going on like this
He was good for us, but then he went to the Tigers and Souths and turned into complete shit.
He was good for us, but then he went to the Tigers and Souths and turned into complete shit.
Why is someone who disagrees with you a troll Swifty?
Seems like a fairly black & white view of the world.
I don't believe anyone to be so uninformed, therefore it is logical to deduce it is a troll.
Sorry mate, but that isn't logical at all.
People are allowed to have different opinions about the merits of Reddy. Just because they disagree with you, it doesn't mean that they are 'uninformed'. It actually means that they have a different opinion.
LMAO THANK YOU FOR YOUR INPUT CAPTAIN OBVIOUS
Now by your same logic you should not deduce that this is a "joke thread" because I and many others have a different opinion to you.
I have called you up on a number of fallacies in this thread with the joke thread being one of them, I wonder if there is a fallacy for defencively citing fallacies when being called up on a fallacy?
This may not be a joke thread but calling someone a troll doesn't have to have merit as you have proven.