If there was no salary cap around the Storm wouldn't have won any premierships. They MAY have acquired all of the big 4 (even that is doubtful) but they wouldn't have got most of the other key players to their success.
Roosters would have loved to have kept Crocker, Canberra probably hang onto Cross as with the Knights and Quinn. Turner was a promising Penrith junior and was probably a tough decision to let him go, the same with Hoffman and the Tigers. I'm sure there are more examples.
This is all theoretical of course, but all those Storm supporters who go on about how bad the salary cap is forget that it is the salary cap that allowed them to form such a formidable side in the first place.
Gee, that's grasping at straws saying the players you mentioned were stolen away in the night.
Maybe when they're dead they will reach cult status in the retelling of the Storm saga. The salary cap
was brought in to prevent the great teams from ever appearing again.
What I'm saying is that the Storm were guilty as charged legally but not morally because they didn't poach.
The Eels didn't poach, Raiders didn't poach, Doggies didn't poach. Now, they have to because the expenditure
in effort involved in doing it the right way has been made null and void.
If people like their teams made up of strangers, so be it. I can live with that . . . the main reason coaching
interests me more than teams. What really gets my goat is that people want to believe that they're not naive
enough to be convinced there's only one bad apple in a barrel where the apples have been around for years.