There was an article on his opinion on the future of the game in the CM the other day.
IT WAS ALL BASED AROUND HIS STRONG VIEWS OF GETTING INTERNATIONAL FOOTY AT THE SAME LEVEL OF STATE OF ORIGIN.
Good read and filled me with hope.
There was an article on his opinion on the future of the game in the CM the other day.
IT WAS ALL BASED AROUND HIS STRONG VIEWS OF GETTING INTERNATIONAL FOOTY AT THE SAME LEVEL OF STATE OF ORIGIN.
Good read and filled me with hope.
Just heard John Grant interviewed on Sky Sports Radio by Jimmy and Zorba and he does sound impressive. He's a good talker and there's no annoying umming and arrrrring. He was asked some difficult questions about the future of the game but was reluctant to answer them on behalf of the entire commission (for obvious reasons - they barely know each other yet).
But he gave a personal insight into expansion and it sounds as though he's all for it. He direct with his answer, but that's what I gathered anyway. He sounds very keen on another Brisbane team and brought up the reasons why the Crushers eventually failed. He quite rightly pointed out the Crushers were successful early before Superleague killed them off.
There was an article on his opinion on the future of the game in the CM the other day.
IT WAS ALL BASED AROUND HIS STRONG VIEWS OF GETTING INTERNATIONAL FOOTY AT THE SAME LEVEL OF STATE OF ORIGIN.
Good read and filled me with hope.
Is this article online somewhere? I can't seem to find it.There was an article on his opinion on the future of the game in the CM the other day.
IT WAS ALL BASED AROUND HIS STRONG VIEWS OF GETTING INTERNATIONAL FOOTY AT THE SAME LEVEL OF STATE OF ORIGIN.
Good read and filled me with hope.
Independence comes a year late
Brent Read
From: The Australian
July 25, 2011 12:00AM
TALKS over the game's next broadcasting deal are set to remain on hold for several months yet after it emerged officials had targeted November 1 as the start-up date for the independent commission.
The Australian understands talks between key stakeholders on Saturday night resolved that the Australian Rugby League and News Limited -- the game's co-owners -- should hand over the mantle on November 1, whereupon the broadcasting negotiations will become the key piece of business. Ironically, the latest target date for commission formation comes almost exactly a year after officials spruiked the commission would begin on November 1 -- only then they were talking about last year.
However, there is no turning back now, given the game has announced the inaugural eight commissioners and elected its first chairman, Queenslander John Grant. While several matters are still to be resolved, chiefly the issue of a non-compete clause and the finalisation of NRL chief executive David Gallop's contract, they are not considered significant enough to stop the commission coming to fruition.
While the November 1 start-up date gives the NRL and its clubs some certainty over the handover of the game, it also means there will be no talks over the broadcasting rights before then.
Club chief executives and chairmen were told at their summit last week that those negotiations could not begin until the commission was legally in place.
It means the broadcasting rights may not be finalised until next year, creating a series of difficult issues. Most notably, the NRL will not be able to confirm a salary cap for 2013 until the broadcasting rights are finalised. That, in turn, means clubs will be unable to spend or recruit with any certainty. The NRL has foreshadowed a series of scenarios based on possible broadcasting deals, with the largest being a whopping $1.4 billion for the next five years. But with so much hingeing on the money the game is expected to generate from those talks, clubs and players are looking at several months of limbo.
Meanwhile, the NRL match review committee has dropped its legal action against Queensland coach Mal Meninga after he used his column in yesterday's The Sunday Mail to clarify his earlier criticism of the body.
Match review commissioner Greg McCallum confirmed the committee saw the matter as resolved. As part of the resolution, Meninga will also fly to Sydney to meet the match review committee.
"The issue and the action taken by the NRL match review committee (MRC) has only ever been about protecting the good name of its members, Greg McCallum, Peter Louis and Bradley Clyde, and the absolute integrity in which those members operate week in week out in the game without bias or interference," McCallum said in a statement. "Mal's comments today clearly reflect and support that view. We see this matter now as resolved. The committee looks forward to welcoming Mal to a meeting of the MRC soon."
Meninga's manager Jim Banaghan said the Maroons coach was never going to back down or apologise for his comments, but was happy to ensure the NRL match review committee knew it was not his intended target.
"It was just some sensible behind-the-scenes talk to see where people had their noses out of joint and how it could be fixed up," Banaghan said.
"Everyone now knows that the people who received the offence, shouldn't have, and were never the intended targets of the original column. Common sense has prevailed. There was no request for an apology, no demands for a retraction. There was a simple request for a clarification."
Clubs hold firm on non-compete clause
Jul 24, 2011 (The Australian Financial Review - ABIX via COMTEX) -- A new five-year agreement on the TV broadcasting rights to National Rugby League (NRL) matches could be worth twice as much as the existing one, or $A1bn. However, a prerequisite for the negotiations is the creation of a new independent commission and therefore the sale of the 50% stake currently held in the NRL by media group News Limited to the Australian Rugby League. This is being hampered by a number of NRL teams insisting that News sign a non-compete clause barring it from establishing any rival championship for two decades. News is only prepared to guarantee this for five years. A 20-year ban may in fact breach competition law.
Is this article online somewhere? I can't seem to find it.
Code must be strong globally: chairman
Marco Monteverde
23/07/11
Courier Mail
Inaugural IC chairman John Grant is adamant that international RL should be at the forefront of the sport's future, despite Australia's obsession with SOO.
Grant said it was cruical for the expansion of RL worldwide that Test matches be placed on similar pedestal to the annual series between QLD & NSW.
"SOO is the jewel in the crown but we should not forget about international RL and its improtance to the game's future" he said. "It's a must that youngsters apsrie to represent their country" "SOO and international RL need to be complementary".
He suggested it should be a priority to ensure the existing Four Nations series was not simply a tournament that would always feature Aus & NZ in the final.
"The challange is the get the British nations and France to consistant levels of performance, but it's a tough task condiering the other sports played at high levels in those countries."
"But the competition that exists between Aus & NZ now is fantasic."
Grant admitted that the RLWC would never compete with the corrosponding tournaments in Soccer & RU in terms of depth and the no. of countries competing.
"Soccer is the world game and RU is playing in more countries than RL" he said. "But for everybody playing the game at the grassroots level, RL needs to be as strong as it can internationally."
Good to hear that people with some sense are involved.Clubs hold firm on non-compete clause
Jul 24, 2011 (The Australian Financial Review - ABIX via COMTEX) -- A new five-year agreement on the TV broadcasting rights to National Rugby League (NRL) matches could be worth twice as much as the existing one, or $A1bn. However, a prerequisite for the negotiations is the creation of a new independent commission and therefore the sale of the 50% stake currently held in the NRL by media group News Limited to the Australian Rugby League. This is being hampered by a number of NRL teams insisting that News sign a non-compete clause barring it from establishing any rival championship for two decades. News is only prepared to guarantee this for five years. A 20-year ban may in fact breach competition law.
It'd be too late anyway. The expansion question won't be decided until we have some formal offers on the table for the TV deal and we know how much the different options are worth.If the commission is put in effect in Novemner, that will probably be too late for expansion in 2013.
One of his interviews
http://www.abc.net.au/sport/audio/2011/07/24/3276560.htm?site=melbourne
He side stepped expansion question.
The 8 commissioners have been chosen.
What stops them from meeting before the start up date and discussing things like expansion and the TV rights, even if they wont have any real power until November 1?
Why the delay until November 1 anyway?
Code must be strong globally: chairman
Marco Monteverde
23/07/11
Courier Mail
Inaugural IC chairman John Grant is adamant that international RL should be at the forefront of the sport's future, despite Australia's obsession with SOO.
Grant said it was cruical for the expansion of RL worldwide that Test matches be placed on similar pedestal to the annual series between QLD & NSW.
"SOO is the jewel in the crown but we should not forget about international RL and its improtance to the game's future" he said. "It's a must that youngsters apsrie to represent their country" "SOO and international RL need to be complementary".
He suggested it should be a priority to ensure the existing Four Nations series was not simply a tournament that would always feature Aus & NZ in the final.
"The challange is the get the British nations and France to consistant levels of performance, but it's a tough task condiering the other sports played at high levels in those countries."
"But the competition that exists between Aus & NZ now is fantasic."
Grant admitted that the RLWC would never compete with the corrosponding tournaments in Soccer & RU in terms of depth and the no. of countries competing.
"Soccer is the world game and RU is playing in more countries than RL" he said. "But for everybody playing the game at the grassroots level, RL needs to be as strong as it can internationally."