Round 13 against the Roosters

[OldPanther]

You're allowed to strip in the act of scoring a try.

Yes which meant RCG had a right to ground it.

 

[bad boy bubby]

Nah, Yeo had come in a long way, To’o was trying to cover the space.

View attachment 30391

View attachment 30392

That was just a great pass by Tedesco that got that try.

 

[OldPanther]

You're allowed to strip when scoring. Perfectly legal.

Which meant RCG can ground it.

 

[Vicpanther]

You're allowed to strip in the act of scoring a try.

If that's the case then it should be a try as rcg was first to recover it

 

[bad boy bubby]

Yes which meant RCG had a right to ground it.

I thought he did ground it myself.

 

[kinghippo]

Roosters will be very happy at half time.
Manu really showing his class, a few of our rookies showing their inexperience.
Edwards forward pass was very costly.

 

[bad boy bubby]

If that's the case then it should be a try as rcg was first to recover it

Agree

 

[billypilgrimnz]

Good game, but Cleary getting the ball on the 5th in the opposition 20 has been a terrible option so far. He has no clue what to do with it.

 

[herbert henry1908]

Never mind, they ruled it was lost.

 

[mxlegend99]

You're allowed to strip when scoring. Perfectly legal.

Stripping is legal. But its lost forward by Tedesco and grounded by RCG after its stripped.

The bunker ruled it was lost. Not stripped. It was stripped clear as f**king day and lost forward in the act by Tedesco. At worst we should be looking at a line dropout

 

[Marky Mark]

I'm fearing that the Ref might steal this game from the boys

 

[OldPanther]

Never mind, they ruled it was lost.

Got me with the edit haha.

 

[mxlegend99]

A strip in the act of scoring is considered lost possesion, ie. A knock on.

No. It isn't. It's a legal play. But if the player stripping knocks on it's a knock on. If he strips and is tackled in goal. Hes tackled in goal.

Its the same rule as field of play only its not restricted to 1 on 1

 

[snickers007]

You're allowed to strip when scoring. Perfectly legal.

Problem with this rule is that neither the rule book nor the Referees have ever taken the time to articulate the actual impact of the rule.

In any other situation, if the ball is stripped but not secured by the stripping team, the team in possession can regain and play on with 6 more tackles. Same scenario in the act of scoring, and the Referees claim knock on / no control.

It's completely incorrect.

That ball was 100% stripped by Tedesco. And RCG then put (the back of) his hand on the grounded ball - which is a try.

Expect another "we got it wrong" from Annesley on Tuesday.

Doesn't help out F/A though...

 

[BxTom]

Ben Cummins doing his impression of a referee and you think we can win.

 

[herbert henry1908]

Still, great half. It's just concerning for me how we have to score through our forwards. We need to find something out wide.

 

[Marky Mark]

I don't care who gets taken off, just bring Luai on now!

 

[bad boy bubby]

The Roosters are a little bit ripe for the picking here.
For your seasons sake I reckon you really need to take them.
I'm cheering for youse.

 

[Panfa]

We can do this boys this is our season on the line right here we win we stay alive we lose and its gonna be very tough.

 

[OldPanther]

Roosters had more possession and we are up so we are doing something right.