Round 17 Vs Titans

[betcats]

That's why a still image sucks because you can't see the decision making. It looks there like Cook should've had DCE but in motion it could be completely different.

Maybe, either way I am done with this subject its getting boring haha.

 

[Luke Bowden]

Maybe, either way I am done with this subject its getting boring haha.

As I thought.

 

[betcats]

As I thought.

You failed to prove your fact so no, not as you thought.

 

[Luke Bowden]

You failed to prove your fact so no, not as you thought.

You explained it perfectly, Cook didn’t cover his man, forced Cordner to take DCE leaving Paps open.

Some how, that’s not a bad read by Cook it’s a bad read by Jimmy, who was already faced with Munster sweeping and creating an over lap.

 

[Luke Bowden]

You failed to prove your fact so no, not as you thought.

Prove my fact? What, I need to prove that Rugby League teams defend inside - Out? Really? I need to prove that Sliding Defence is a thing??

 

[Pomoz]

View attachment 31433
DCE has the ball. He is on Cooks outside shoulder - he is Cooks responsibility.

Cordner Has Paps on his outside shoulder, he is Cordners.

Maloney has Munster.

Well that's pretty clear to be fair. Cordner didn't slide, probably gassed which is fair enough. He did plenty of tough carries.

EDIT. And Cook didn't slide either. He's plenty quick enough to catch DCE.

 

[age.s]

Why can't it be ordinary from both players? Cordner made a shit read jamming in on DCE. Jimmy should have read the play better but isn't a great defender and probably isn't going to stop Papalii from there anyway.

 

[OldPanther]

Why can't it be ordinary from both players? Cordner made a shit read jamming in on DCE. Jimmy should have read the play better but isn't a great defender and probably isn't going to stop Papalii from there anyway.

Honestly I think it's on Cook. A fee times he let his outside defenders down.

 

[Luke Bowden]

Honestly I think it's on Cook. A fee times he let his outside defenders down.

This 100%