franklin2323
Immortal
- Messages
- 33,546
Ivan getting ready to shit the bed again :-(
The pack steamrolls everyone regardless
Ivan getting ready to shit the bed again :-(
I obviously hope it doesn’t happen, but it would be an interesting experiment to see how the full strength pack would go without Cleary.The pack steamrolls everyone regardless
What an utter load of crap!!! Watch it again and you will see two players coming at him, one to the left one to his right (Topou). He tried to cover for both, but last minute Topou got the ball. He had a fraction of a second to act, he tried to tackle Topou, but missed, just.Its not like defensivley hes been brilliant either. Last game he missed a one on one on topou which youd expect a winger to normally make.
Hes been good in defence but not outstanding. Given his output in attack i dont think being ok in defence is enough to be picked.
Not sure who said it the other day about ivan wanting the best mix of attack and defence across the back but i think they may be right.
Defensivley its hard to argue with
2. Critta
3. Momo
4. Burton
5. Too (when his back)
Wouldnt be my choice backline but defensivley its the safest.
I obviously hope it doesn’t happen, but it would be an interesting experiment to see how the full strength pack would go without Cleary.
While I think our pack is very good, I think it really benefits from the positions that Cleary puts them in. Of course, maybe Cleary puts them into excellent positions because he is often playing off the front foot. Maybe it is a team game and both are important.
Anyway, just some musings on the train to work…
Its not like defensivley hes been brilliant either. Last game he missed a one on one on topou which youd expect a winger to normally make.
Hes been good in defence but not outstanding. Given his output in attack i dont think being ok in defence is enough to be picked.
Not sure who said it the other day about ivan wanting the best mix of attack and defence across the back but i think they may be right.
Defensivley its hard to argue with
2. Critta
3. Momo
4. Burton
5. Too (when his back)
Wouldnt be my choice backline but defensivley its the safest.
Wouldn't even put them in the same ball park lol, Crichton barely gets involved and would need to go looking for the ball and putting plays on for this comparison to even be close.
Just typical stuff like teams trying under the radar or whatever. Though I don't think it really matters. I don't know if 5% of our fans even know the name of name of our Chairman. I don't think think Souths players are gathered around a paper seeing this thinking oh boys the pressure's on us now.Nice article.
Wake up call.
They shut him down when he was one game back. Bloke was so tired he was bludgeing on the wing when he took that intercept. Completely different to the usual Turbo taking a bunch of one off the ruck hit ups like a prop.Critter and Nathan totally shut down Trubo. Pure insanity if he plays anywhere but right centre
Exactly. Staines until last week was the only constant on the best defensive right side in the competition. At it's peak it's Cleary, Crichton and Staines together. He was also our leading try scorer until Burton passed him.We’ve conceded 13 tries all year down the right. The least in the league by a distance. The next best is Melbourne, Gold Coast and Sharks on between 22 & 23. That’s considering the vast majority of sides are much more potent down their left edge in attack. Capewell, Cleary, Crichton and Staines are all a big part of that. They all make great decisions, effective contact and they trust each other.
Whoever said Souths ceiling is higher than ours a few pages back gave the perfect demonstration of attacking bias. No team that is distinctly average in defence will hold a candle to a historically good defensive team regardless of their attack. Breaking up our right edge because one of its members, our leading try scorer, has ‘only scored walk ins’ and doesn’t make 200m when you have two of the most effective metre making backs in the world, would be the most insane example of attacking bias.
Staines for sure needed a rest. Every player that hasn’t had a break should be getting a break against a rabble like the Dragons/Tigers. I remember Franklin said pre-season a successful year for Charlie would be getting through 6-7 games of first grade unscathed. He’s played 20 and should absolutely finish on 26 or there’s every chance we’ll be trashing Ivan for another f*ckhead galaxy brain move costing us a premiership.
He's been outright elite in defence bar one miss.
So why was he dropped then?
Whoever said Souths ceiling is higher than ours a few pages back gave the perfect demonstration of attacking bias.
Because apparently wingers need to be props now.
Be great to see him with the licence to follow TPJ; he would pop a few passes…Exactly. Staines until last week was the only constant on the best defensive right side in the competition. At it's peak it's Cleary, Crichton and Staines together. He was also our leading try scorer until Burton passed him.
Staines just reads the game well and seems to make good decisions on when to rush out of the line and has the pace to make sure it works. He also has the pace that it's hard to kick in behind him and he tends to nullify other teams speedsters pretty well.
He's far from perfect. But he has a great strike rate, rarely concedes tries and he has speed to cancel out players in other teams which would otherwise be able to shred us. We need to use him better for sure. We just don't seem to create space on our right edge to put him into gaps. But when Cleary has missed as much of the season as he has, and half Staines games on that wing were outside of a centre that doesn't pass it's pretty hard to get the best out of a player who needs space. We should try and get him to follow guys who can offload though too. If someone can poke their nose through and get it into his hands it will be a try more often than not. He doesnt really follow people for offloads, but we also don't seem to have many offloaders in the team.
The fact he made 22 errors in 20 games has nothing to do with it?