Running late after a bad night on the green fairy, PrideKnight runs on with a nice greasy big mac
Bad Boys, Bad Boys
They are the men we all love to hate, the ones who bring the game into disrepute with deplorable acts of violence, drug use, sexual misconduct, or all of the above and more.
You know who Im talking about, especially in recent weeks with the Tevita Latu scandal still fresh in our minds. There is no excuse for assaulting a woman, or sticking your fingers up another players arse (on the field anyway), invading a sleeping girls bedroom and performing a lewd act, being drunk and disorderly, urinating in public. I could go on, but I think the point is made.
The question is, why is it such a big deal when these particular people do it? I mean they are common offences, men beat their wives daily, home invasions occur with an alarming frequency, hell, Ive been known to be drunk and disorderly, urinating in an alley, but my name, and the names of those other more serious perpetrators arent plastered all over the media.
And theres the answer. When it comes to sports, and especially it seems rugby league, bad news really sells. The reason for this is fairly broad, but at least part of it comes from us. How many times has a player come under scrutiny and you are able to rip into the supporters of said players team? I can think of numerous ones in the past few months alone, Tevita of course, Tim Smith and Mark Ridell, and of course Brian Carney (though I cant exactly rip into myself about that one can I?).
And there you have it, its all you talk about at the water cooler the next day, you start analyzing the scanty facts and deliberating over the possible penalties and laughing how stupid some people can be to play up when they are in the public spotlight. But you buy the paper the next day to follow the saga dont you?
It seems that every time our great game settles down from the last big scandal, a new one is lurking in the wings, and, lo and behold, the media has their paws all over it before the club involved even has a chance to respond to it.
Is it right? No, I dont think so, fair enough there has been law broken, but should the club not be allowed to investigate before the player is sprayed in shame all across the back (or worse, front) page of the paper? If only so they can get all sides of the story and compensate the victims (if any) before the machinations of the big media monster can blow it out of proportion with what is often only innuendo and hearsay.
Normally this sort of thing is only highly prevalent in the lead up to a season, as it often seems to be a case of bad judgment from a player on a last ditch bender before their lives belong to the public and the game for another 6 months.
At the same time, it also seems that a pre season scandal is like a negative publicity exercise, bringing Rugby League once more (however unorthodoxly) to the forefront of the publics mind. You need only look to pre season 2004, and, to a lesser extent, pre season 2005 for two examples.
The Coffs Harbour rape scandal got people fired up, doggies fans, feeling they had to prove the honour of their boys, and everyone else because they didnt want to see these alleged rapists honoured with any glory. It may have been negative, it may have involved a police investigation, but again it had people talking.
Our own indiscretion in the eve of season 2005 was similar, but had less impact in a way, as the early leakage of the story meant that the club took a hardline (if knee jerk) stance on it. Dismissing the supposed main antagonist and going into damage control.
At the end of the day, the onus is on the players to be sure they behave in a fitting manner, but they are only human, and surely cannot be expected to be saints 100% of the time. Then again, some of them are just thugs and cant control their baser instincts, these are the true Bad Boys, who really shouldnt have a place in our game.
*EDIT* Adding word count
723 Words incl. Title