To'o has only scored 2 tries and both happened when Whare didnt get the ball. The first was off a poor pass that missed Whare. The second was off Edwards who give him clean ball directly.There's a rumour floated that Whare is bound for the ESL, id rather it be mansour than Whare, it sux coz To'o has a great combo with him,
So you didn't mean the most recent game. So did you mean the games 4 months ago? The ones without our halfback or the ones without a fullback?
Why cant it be both mansour and whare they are holding younger faster skillful back out of the team.Id rather have mcgrady at centre and naden on the wing over mansour and whare.Sure mansour whare more experienced players but naden and mcgrady lot better attackers.Both tall and good in the air also.
I wouldn't be dropping either Whare or Mansour. Both have drawbacks but I can't see Naden replacing either of them. His best way into first grade is by replacing Crichton which is very unlikely to happen. His chance to play bench is almost no chance once May returns.
And as far as I know we don't have any other outside backs worth bringing in. Tough to judge without reserve grade being played.
Right now I don't think we make any team changes. Capewell straight in when he is fit, May possibly on the bench over Luai/Burton. And while it feels weird seeing Burton play 0 minutes it was the right call in the Storm game. If we hadn't shat the bed a week prior against the Eels he would have played 0 minutes as well.
Yes I am arguing that Manu getting cleaned up goes to show how good a performance Whare put in against Jennings and that the biggest factor in defending against an opposition centre is the ability of the centre guarding him, not the men inside and outside. What kind of clown would back themselves into a position where they had to try and argue against such blatantly obvious things?
Bullshit. He was worse defensively then Cleary or to’o on Friday, I’ve given my reasons why, prove me wrong.
It was a stupid point you made. Watch that last parra try and tell me Cleary would not of hammered Jennings in flannos place. Flanno actually took out his back rower coming over in cover with his shitness.
I wouldn't be dropping either Whare or Mansour. Both have drawbacks but I can't see Naden replacing either of them. His best way into first grade is by replacing Crichton which is very unlikely to happen. His chance to play bench is almost no chance once May returns.
And as far as I know we don't have any other outside backs worth bringing in. Tough to judge without reserve grade being played.
Right now I don't think we make any team changes. Capewell straight in when he is fit, May possibly on the bench over Luai/Burton. And while it feels weird seeing Burton play 0 minutes it was the right call in the Storm game. If we hadn't shat the bed a week prior against the Eels he would have played 0 minutes as well.
Why cant it be both mansour and whare they are holding younger faster skillful back out of the team.Id rather have mcgrady at centre and naden on the wing over mansour and whare.Sure mansour whare more experienced players but naden and mcgrady lot better attackers.Both tall and good in the air also.
Left has been going great, the threat of kikau adds a lot of options.
I thought Martin helped the right side attack this week, he bent the line a few times and got some quick play the balls. Hopefully it will continue to improve.
He was like that last year as well but just like most rookies had a few silly handling mistakes and penalties in him (like Burns in this game) He cuts that to a minimum and he becomes a VERY good 2nd rower. It really makes the Capewell signing all the more puzzling - since we already have too many options for the 2nd row.
An example for this discussion. This looks fantastic as a team effort but without Nathan Whare is made to look silly defensively and a try is scored. @martielang
That’s your best example? Gets palmed off, keeps his feet, comes back & makes the tackle with Cleary. If anything it probably shows his experience by keeping his composure & not going to ground.
Without Cleary it's a certain try. For the guy people say is a great defensive centre getting easily palmed and needing saving by the halfback with under 100 games seems to support what @betcats is saying.
Im not saying he is a bad defender and he played that situation well despite being pushed off initially he recovered and got some help, if anything it’s a great example of clearys cover Defense which has been exceptional this season . Olam got on Whare’s outside again after that one and he recovered again and with some help with from To’o made a good tackle. He did nothing wrong in either instance but he certainly wasn’t shutting his down opposite number on his own.
You can pull up Whare’s tackle efficiency for each year on nrl.com and you’ll can see his decline from his best days defensively. His tackle efficiency was in the 80s at his peak, his rookie year was is his lowest at 73 but hes currently below that this season. He shows glimpses of his old self at times but he also shows glimpses of his age and decline, he is missing tackles at a similar rate to Naden last season. He is still much better defender than Naden but he makes errors now that he never used to.
You can mount an argument for Naden in the starting lineup, you can’t do the same for McGrady. He has endured two ACL reconstructions, played but a handful of NSW Cup games and the one’s I’ve seen him in he hasn’t yet shown the sort of promise which would demand his selection in front of either Whare or Mansour. If he is still here next season then hopefully he may get an opportunity if he improves sufficiently but I can’t see him playing NRL in 2020.
He gets beaten often. He misses a lot of tackles. But has great guys to help bail him out.That’s your best example? Gets palmed off, keeps his feet, comes back & makes the tackle with Cleary. If anything it probably shows his experience by keeping his composure & not going to ground.