c_eagle picks up the ball for the pirates and then realises he's actually about to type an article so he puts it back down and starts typing.
Rugby League Rules
To describe the very nature of the very notion of this very article in this very competition on this very forum would be like trying to recreate some arbitrary 20th century historical event. Everyone has their own little introspective point of view, which they are certain everyone cares about, yet the facts, the basic truth behind this 20th century almost forgotten event, which Im not really talking about, because its an article about rugby league, arent really important. Its just a matter of creating enough wankery to fool the reader into believing that what looks, quacks and acts like a duck, may not actually be a duck unless Im trying to prove that whatever this non existent event is, is in fact, a duck. So yes, I may know for CERTAIN that Manly have been awful for the last 20 years and have won, 2 lucky premierships, just like 6 billion people are certain that their religion is the right one. Well, if there are 1000 religions, there are at least 999 incorrect ones, and so on.
One might ask, why do the very same people who spend countless hours of their lives discussing football with their friends (the fortunate ones, in any case) stay up all hours of the night talking about football on internet forums, watch every single rugby league dedicated program on every medium available, possibly more than once, not to mention the sports news bulletins and sports news websites which are obsessed over, spend the entire weekend watching every NRL, ESL and whatever other L thats out there, feel that their appetite isnt sufficed, at least until they submit an essay on a rugby league topic? Its almost a staple of the steadfast league follower to ponder an important question like, or Why does NRL news come after AFL news on Sports Tonight? And surely those people (possibly Melbournians) who worked out the alphabet were being discriminatory.
Deconstructing the sport, both on the field and politically, on online forums and in pubs, just isnt enough for those involved with Forum Sevens. Why would a person who convulsed at even the thought of writing an essay at school (me) even if it was on a seemingly enjoyable topic, volunteer, nay, insist on nominating himself for humanities stereotypical chore?
Its because the point of view of the arbitrary 20th century event, whether it was the Korean War or the Grand Final replay of 1978, is what one might consider to be significant enough to not only be published but also be submitted for rating. Is writing in the Forum Sevens competition the literary equivalent of Robster putting his photo up on the Hot or Not? website? Id say so. This narcissistic drive is not there to prove that the opinion is significant, oh no, this is a given for the Forum Sevens submitter. The idea is to try and stake a claim for your religion, amongst the thousands of incorrect ones. After all, if my opinion was incorrect, surely I wouldnt be stupid enough to continue believing it?
Now all of this may seem a bit shallow, cynical even. Some of the optimists might say, Couldnt you both be right? I dont think Ben Kennedy dived on Wednesday, stupid Queenslanders and scorned Knights fans probably do. Its within this example that makes Forum Sevens a crucial entity for the diehard league fan, this ability to outscore other diehard league fans in order to prove that they are a more astute judge a better fan, even. Obviously its not as simple as this, because we are all blinded by some sort of bias. We all have the tendency to cling onto our team in a debate. Maybe not all the time, for some of us, theres no doubt in my mind that every fan gives their club the benefit of the doubt in most situations.
Is the Roosters recruiting policy a detriment to rugby league? Rooster fans would say its about professionalism and blah blah blah. Souths fans would disagree and would most likely also resort to blah blahing in retaliation. But how do we prove anything? Because, after all, I spend so much of my life on my rugby league dedication; surely Im entitled to the truth? Surely these arbitrary events have a symmetrical answer. I know! Lets write essays about it and whoever gets the highest mark in the match, is obviously correct. Sounds like a good plan but arent the referees fans too?