What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Round Three: Nirvana vs Queen

Who is better?

  • Nirvana

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Queen

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Anonymous

Juniors
Messages
46
Nirvana

Profile:

Prior to Nirvana, alternative music was consigned to specialty sections of record stores and major labels considered it to be, at the very most, a tax write-off. After the band's second album, 1991's Nevermind, nothing was ever quite the same, for better and for worse. Nirvana popularized punk, post-punk, and indie rock, unintentionally bringing it into the American mainstream like no other band before it.

Queen

Profile:

Few bands embodied the pure excess of the '70s like Queen. Embracing the exaggerated pomp of prog-rock and heavy metal, as well as vaudevellian music-hall, the British quartet delved deeply into camp and bombast, creating a huge, mock-operatic sound with layered guitars and overdubbed vocals. Queen's music was a bizarre yet highly accessible fusion of the macho and the fey.
 

Misanthrope

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
47,627
Queen. Nirvana are great in their own way, but Queen have effected people beyond their own generation- it'll be a while befoe Nirvana can do the same.
 

Nuke

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
5,421
I unfortunately didn't get the chance to vote but ...

Queen. Easily. Nirvana were good, but apart from the odd song here and there, they didn't do it for me.
 

madunit

Super Moderator
Staff member
Messages
62,358
Queen by a landslide, Nirvana were big for a few years, Queen were creating music for near 3 decades. This is a no brainer.
 

Latest posts

Top