hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 154,216
What was said for those who missed it???great listening.
What was said for those who missed it???great listening.
you guys are a bunch of idiots..lol (oops sorry, I take that bacl)
anyway, Roy didn't say anything that was out of the ordinary, but did ackowledge that was a hard campaign, he also said that he is being considered for the chairmans position but Hilditch and Gerrard need to be consulted.
He's given Anderson full support (sorry Ando you're gone..lol) and understands that he inherited the squad that he has now, they're obviously looking at improving the squad.
when asked about ANZ stadium, he said that they're looking at more corporate support to come on board to assist financially and maybe strike a naming rights deal with the trusr, the problem there is that they currently have 5 year deal with ANZ stadium which will make life interesting.
he did say that they're going to the agm to look at changing the constittion with the 3 3 rule and I they haven't ruled out bringing Saad and Saasson on board in place of Gerrard and Hilditch.
I think that's it..
Thing that got me, was that they are looking at naming rights for Parramatta Stadium. Can anyone else bring themselves to call it something else???
I just hope it isnt something "ANZ Stadium" or "CUA Stadium"....
What does that mean? I don't understand it. Please explain
What does that mean? I don't understand it. Please explain
It is always gonna be Cumberland Oval to me, no matter what ANYONE else calls it
so can someone explain to me why at the AGM I should NOT vote to over turn this rule?
He's given Anderson full support (sorry Ando you're gone..lol) and understands that he inherited the squad that he has now, they're obviously looking at improving the squad.
I would agree with voting to get rid of it, but personally I reckon the 5 3P members + the 2 PLC would make for a better transition board for now
separation of powers. i don't think it's good for the board to be completely over-turned to give power to one group in one hit. having at least some old faces with the new keeps everyone on their toes and doing their job properly and ensures that everyone is always accountable to at least one other person.so can someone explain to me why at the AGM I should NOT vote to over turn this rule?
Why is he talking about the team ? I thought that they were returning the NRL franchise back to the FC ? High priority they said.
but at the end of the day a 5-2 split means they have very little say or vote against doesnt it...