What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rugby Australia to target top NRL talent

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,413
Super league was great for union players that they signed up

Oh wait
Of course they would smash it union...but no one knows who they are outside of Australia.

They aren't trying to sign players no ones heard of, they are signing Union ' All Stars '... house hold names in the union world.

I'll be surprised if they offer NRL players 5 million, Ponga playing isn't going to sell a single ticket outside of Australia
If losing Cleary is the price to pay to see Union get decimated then I’m ok with it
 
Messages
628
Of course they would smash it union...but no one knows who they are outside of Australia.
They`d know who they are very quickly when they their skills on display, like a certain slightly-better-than-average NRL player who has been making headlines in union all week.
I can see a compromise being reached between world union here and the breakaway money, especially since union will be desperate to get their hands on the money. But that compromise is going to involve rule changes to make the game more palatable for spectators. They may end up with a game that resembles Rugby League, but with lineouts and a few other things to make them think they are still watching union.
Where would that leave us if union actually became a game bearable to watch. Lost the battle but won the war.
 

Chimp

Bench
Messages
2,850
I’d prefer us to profit from the Arab squillions… they’ll love rugby league - reckon they’d be up for bringing back the shoulder charge and fighting too…. Sign me up!
 

taste2taste

Juniors
Messages
2,427
They`d know who they are very quickly when they their skills on display, like a certain slightly-better-than-average NRL player who has been making headlines in union all week.
I can see a compromise being reached between world union here and the breakaway money, especially since union will be desperate to get their hands on the money. But that compromise is going to involve rule changes to make the game more palatable for spectators. They may end up with a game that resembles Rugby League, but with lineouts and a few other things to make them think they are still watching union.
Where would that leave us if union actually became a game bearable to watch. Lost the battle but won the war.
And on to the field runs the Cape Town Tigers with some of the biggest names in in world rugby...and some bloke at fullback who no ones heard of and has never played Union.

I just can't see it happening, especially when they are only having 8 teams. They'll easily be able to fill those teams with Rugby players that fans know.

If they do change the rules for it to be more like league it will be great, we'll get instant access to a true global game.

In regards to the Unions reaching a financial compromise with the middle east backers, world Rugby already knocked them back last year. I doubt Rugby will go back to them cap in hand ask for some money please....and if they did they might not like the answer, I get the feeling this whole comp is a big FU to world rugby for rejecting them last year.
 
Last edited:

Matt_CBY

Juniors
Messages
1,388
People always overreact over these things.

It’s not gonna kill Rugby League. It’s not gonna bring the rugby codes back together. We’ve been through this a million times on both sides of the divide.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,413
I’d prefer us to profit from the Arab squillions… they’ll love rugby league - reckon they’d be up for bringing back the shoulder charge and fighting too…. Sign me up!
They tried to buy the manly club

They paid the price the penns wanted then he changed his mind and asked for 28 million for the club

Would’ve funded the ground too
 

Trifili13

Juniors
Messages
1,119
If the middle east throw enough money at rugby(and we know they have almost an endless amount) would it entice NZ and Pacific Island background players to play union instead of league thus impacting league's pathways?

While most of us prefer league over union, money (and lots of it, as superleague proved) talks when it can set your family up.
 

Matt_CBY

Juniors
Messages
1,388
If the middle east throw enough money at rugby(and we know they have almost an endless amount) would it entice NZ and Pacific Island background players to play union instead of league thus impacting league's pathways?

While most of us prefer league over union, money (and lots of it, as superleague proved) talks when it can set your family up.
Why only NZ & PI players?
 

Trifili13

Juniors
Messages
1,119
Why only NZ & PI players?
Money would entice alot of players I would think, i just mentioned NZ and Pacific Islanders as most would probably have some affinity with both sports, I would think they would be prime targets to sway them towards union over league.
 
Top