What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rule tweaks incoming?

Matt_CBY

Juniors
Messages
1,482
I've watched every Rams game and most of the prime time games. I haven't seen much of a difference.

I think there has only been 1 return against the Rams after 9 games.

.
There were multiple in each of the Panthers/Giants & Lions/Packers & Cheifs/Bucs alone.
 

Penrose Warrior

First Grade
Messages
9,452
The Collins KO happened on the 15m line. Under that premise, the Chooks had a seven tackle set from there, but if you kicked short of the 20 - let's say 25 - the defense meets you at the 30 and you get six tackles. First scenario is a no brainier, unless teams decide to go shorter and compete.

I am 100% all for protecting the head but to me this new rule tears at the fabric of the game too much. Penalise those who get it wrong in a huge way if you have to.
 

Chimp

Bench
Messages
2,855
I can’t remember which journo it was, or on which podcast (though something tells me in my mind it had Zorba on it)….. but if I heard it, I’m sure there’ll be others on here who equally listen to anything NRL related that will have heard it and will likely have a better memory than me to name them… anyway, in the very early days of podcasts, there was a journo who told a story about how him and a group of his sports journo colleagues used to have bets and competitions on things they could influence. Whoever it was told a story about how they’d choose a particular player who was nowhere near rep selection and basically talk him up all season and see if they could get them into the Kangaroos team, and it worked! They also said they used to make up silly suggestions and push them, using lines like ‘an NRL source has confirmed that they’re looking at….’ until the NRL started considering said suggestions.
The only people I ever hear talking bollocks about concussions and reducing contact are dickheads like Brent Read, who haven’t got a clue about the game… they just make shit up, and then build another 5 stories off of it.
See the Chammas suggestion that ‘he wouldn’t be surprised if the Sharks chased Pappy would tell Will Kennedy he’s free to leave’… that then led to 3 days of other articles about how the Sharks are targeting Pappy…. Nobody from the Sharks ever said anything of the sort.
These media folk are self-perpetuating…
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,552


The NRL used to boast it was “one of the closest competitions in the world”. During the 2010s, nine different clubs lifted the premiership trophy. At the end of the 2018 regular season, just one win was all that separated the minor premiers from the team in eighth place.
What happened?

Play Video

NRL Highlights: Storm v Panthers - Grand Final
Play video
14:04
NRL Highlights: Storm v Panthers - Grand Final
Melbourne Storm take on the Penrith Panthers in the Grand Final of the 2024 NRL Premiership Finals at Accor Stadium, Sydney.
In the past eight seasons, the league has had only three premiers. The Roosters, then Melbourne and especially Penrith, have dominated the league in recent times. This year’s grand final match-up between the Panthers and Storm had seemed inevitable for months.
Penrith’s four-year premiership winning streak has drawn comparisons to the 11-year reign of St George, who once controlled the contest so well that administrators had to change the rules to give the rest of the competition a chance to catch up. In 1967, the NSWRL introduced four-tackle sets, replacing unlimited tackles, with tackle counts extended to the current six-tackle rule in 1971. The Dragons – premiers every season from 1956 to 1966 – didn’t win the competition again until 1977.
Should the league consider the same thing now? And if so, what rule should change? The old thorny topic of an NRL draft is being considered again, but there could be a simpler solution.
Does the six-again rule help the stronger teams?
First, the obvious: the Penrith Panthers are a fantastic team. The greatest of the NRL era. A team this good would excel whatever the rules.
But, just maybe, they’ve been given a leg up by playing in the “six-again” era.
NRL top eight at end of 2018 season
Table with 6 columns and 8 rows.
Position Team Points Wins Losses Difference
1 Roosters 34 16 8 181
2 Storm 34 16 8 173
3 Rabbitohs 34 16 8 145
4 Sharks 34 16 8 96
5 Panthers 32 15 9 56
6 Broncos 32 15 9 56
7 Dragons 32 15 9 47
8 Warriors 32 15 9 25
Get the data•Created with Datawrapper
The six-again rule, introduced midway through the Covid-affected 2020 season, meant penalties for ruck infringements were replaced by an immediate set restart. The following year the rule was expanded to include 10-metre offside infringements as well. It immediately led to some wild scorelines and a series of thrashings, and a year later the rule was tweaked so that it didn’t apply when a team was within 40 metres of its own tryline.
The nature of the six-again rule makes its nature hard to quantify – the game doesn’t stop when a set restart is awarded, so commentators and fans don’t get much of a chance to go back and assess whether a referee’s decision to reset the tackle count was harsh or fair.
Did a defender hang on in a tackle a few seconds too long? Was a defender really offside? And what was that set restart for, exactly?
The Panthers have dominated the six-again era with four straight premierships.
The Panthers have dominated the six-again era with four straight premierships.CREDIT: GETTY IMAGES
The NRL’s own website doesn’t provide statistics for set restarts, either game-by-game or across the season, so the likely effect of the rule partly comes down to theory rather than pure numbers. So try this theory out for size.
Better-drilled defensive teams are less likely to give away set restarts. Fitter teams, and better defensive teams, are more likely to cope if forced to defend for multiple sets in succession. Those teams may also choose to slow down the ruck a little longer, backing their ability to hold out their opponents even if they are punished with a repeat set. Meanwhile, better attacking teams are more likely to take advantage of a set restart against a tiring defence and score more tries after being awarded a six-again.
So, in theory, the six-again rule rewards the better teams in multiple ways. It doesn’t mean every set restart will favour the stronger teams over the weaker ones. But it could mean the better teams might win more often than they used to, and start to dominate over the course of the season.
Which is exactly what we’ve seen since the rule came in.
Fewer stoppages, fewer competitive games?
Since the six-again rule was introduced in 2020, the good teams have improved and the rest of the league has got worse.
Looking at the past dozen seasons, the top six teams each season have scored an extra 3.4 points per game since 2020, with no change to their defensive record. The rest of the league has scored an extra 1.3 points per game but conceded an extra 2.5. Teams ranked 14 and 15 have conceded an extra four points per game since 2020.
2013-2019
2020-2024
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
Team rank
0
30
20
10
Points scored per game

Flourish logoA Flourish chart
2013-2019
2020-2024
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
Team rank
0
30
20
10
Points conceded per game

Flourish logoA Flourish chart
The NRL website tracks the number of “close games” per season – matches decided by six points or fewer. There have been 52.6 close games per year since the introduction of the six-again rule, after the previous six seasons produced 65.8 close games per year. That’s 13 fewer tight games every year.
The three seasons with the fewest close games in recent times came directly after the introduction of the six-again rule, in 2020, 2021 and 2022. The past two seasons – after the six-again rule was pared back, no longer applying to teams inside their own 40 metres – have seen an increase in the number of close games, although still less than the pre-six-again era, even with an extra 12 games being played each season after the introduction of the Dolphins as the league’s 17th club.
Between 2014 and 2019, 33 per cent of NRL games – one in three – was decided by six points or less. Since 2020 that’s dropped to 26 per cent, about one in four.
Is the timing just a coincidence?
Maybe the Panthers are just leaps and bounds above their main rivals, and the Storm and Roosters are miles ahead of the rest of the pack. If that’s the case, no change in the rule book is likely to make a difference.
Before the six-again rule came in we already had dominant teams in the salary cap era – during the 2010s, the Storm and the Roosters had eight minor premierships between them. They just didn’t go on to win the grand final every year, like Penrith are doing now.
And the six-again rule has its advocates. It cuts down on penalties, keeps the ball in play more during attacking raids, and has led to more points being scored (although it’s up for debate whether more points equates to more entertaining contests).
But the numbers suggest the rule widens the gap between the best teams and the rest. If the NRL wants to make the league more competitive, they could just take the game back to where it was in 2018.
 

Apey

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
28,261
The 6 again rule has very obviously contributed to Panthers dominance, you'd have to be incredibly biased or a moron not to realise that, but the 6 agains are also nothing like they were in the first couple of seasons. They were handed out like candy in 2020 - 2021 and it felt like touch footy.

Removing 6 agains wouldn't have changed anything from the past 2 - 3 years. The same teams (Panthers in particular) would have still been the best. Maybe just less thrashings throughout the year.
 

Fangs

Coach
Messages
13,727
It was just happy timing.

No one comes close to the fitness levels of the Penrith Panthers. That is the secret of the gears. Some refer to it as oil or lubricant.

Getting the 6 again rule in place just as we became far and away the fittest club was a nice bonus. Clubs like the Roosters would be in a better place without the 6 again rule because they can slow the game down.
 

Chins get the wins

First Grade
Messages
8,243
The 6 again rule has very obviously contributed to Panthers dominance, you'd have to be incredibly biased or a moron not to realise that, but the 6 agains are also nothing like they were in the first couple of seasons. They were handed out like candy in 2020 - 2021 and it felt like touch footy.

Removing 6 agains wouldn't have changed anything from the past 2 - 3 years. The same teams (Panthers in particular) would have still been the best. Maybe just less thrashings throughout the year.
We'd have won even more games if the infractions were called penalties like they always should have been.
 

kurt faulk

Coach
Messages
14,413
No one comes close to the fitness levels of the Penrith Panthers. That is the secret of the gears. Some refer to it as oil or lubricant.

Nothing exemplifies this more than when the chickens charged down a Panthers kick and regathered the ball in the finals.

Every Panthers player was back in line on their try line before one chickens player had made it to dummy half.

.
 

Fangs

Coach
Messages
13,727
Nothing exemplifies this more than when the chickens charged down a Panthers kick and regathered the ball in the finals.

Every Panthers player was back in line on their try line before one chickens player had made it to dummy half.

.

Precisely. They flexed a bit against the Sharks at their home ground as well.

Well oiled gears are the secret.
 

Apey

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
28,261
It was just happy timing.

No one comes close to the fitness levels of the Penrith Panthers. That is the secret of the gears. Some refer to it as oil or lubricant.

Getting the 6 again rule in place just as we became far and away the fittest club was a nice bonus. Clubs like the Roosters would be in a better place without the 6 again rule because they can slow the game down.
Well in 2019 the year before the 6 again was introduced where Panthers largely had the same squad as 2020 - 2021, they were completely irrelevant. Guess it was a big off-season.
 

Rod

Bench
Messages
3,726
We'd have won even more games if the infractions were called penalties like they always should have been.
This assumes that the referees would have blown penalties at the same rate as they currently do for set restarts.

I don't have any data (as that article says it doesn't seem like it's available?) but I doubt that's the case - the eye test suggests referees are more willing to give out set restarts than penalties and they get less scrutiny.
 

Fangs

Coach
Messages
13,727
Well in 2019 the year before the 6 again was introduced where Panthers largely had the same squad as 2020 - 2021, they were completely irrelevant. Guess it was a big off-season.

That was due to servicing issues. Had to garage the Ferrari that year while clearing out the old man stink of Anthony Griffin from the backseat.

The last round thrashing we administered at home was a sign of what was to come (Against the hapless Knights...54-10 IIRC).

Also had a sex tape thing happen. Had to release some boys.
 

taste2taste

Juniors
Messages
2,466
Does anyone have any ideas how we can promote more attacking footy ?
Teams are currently playing a ‘high percentage’ style of footy, 5 tackles and a kick to the corner.

This years GF would have to be one of the dullest in the past 20 yrs ( no offense to Panther and Storm fans )

Over in the cave threads the LU brains trust has suggested relaxing the interpretation of the knock on, if the ball goes forward it’s a knock on but if it travels side ways or backwards play on. This could lead to more offloads and attacking footy if teams are less likely to turn the ball over via a knock on.


We could adopt the Super League rule of a free play when the defending team gets the ball from a knock on, teams could throw the ball around and attack knowing if they lose the ball on the zero tackle they will still retain possession at the initial knock on.

Any other ideas from the sharpest minds on the LU forums ??
 
Last edited:

Chins get the wins

First Grade
Messages
8,243
Does anyone have any ideas how we can promote more attacking footy ?
Teams are currently playing a ‘high percentage’ style of footy, 5 tackles and a kick to the corner.

This years GF would have to be one of the dullest in the past 20 yrs ( no offense to Panther and Storm fans )

Over in the cave threads the LU brains trust has suggested relaxing the interpretation of the knock on, if the ball goes forward it’s a knock on but if it travels side ways or backwards play on. This could lead to more offloads and attacking footy if teams are less likely to turn the ball over via a knock on.


We could adopt the Super League rule of a free play when the defending team gets the ball from a knock on, teams could throw the ball around and attack knowing if they lose the ball on the zero tackle they will still retain possession at the initial knock on.

Any other ideas from the sharpest minds on the LU forums ??
And yet the 2023 GF is in the top 5 of all time. The football currently being played is brilliant.
 

Latest posts

Top