Rumoured and Confirmed signings and Crap IV

[eels_fan]

All I've ever seen from JWH is ill-directed aggression and cheap shots ..

 

[Parra Pride]

I like JWH, and god knows our pack, as good as it is, could use some aggression.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Yeah I rate him too. f**king brutal.

 

[newmanj]

2013

 

[El Diablo]

bummer

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Well that confirms the Bulldogs got Lussick.

 

[MrT]

2013

I haven't heard anything about JWH but I have heard we're after a Rooster. BJ Leilua

 

[Fibroman]

Matt Roberts from the Cowboys. Had some discipline issues but by all accounts has some ability.

 

[hineyrulz]

Well that confirms the Bulldogs got Lussick.

Re-signing Rose and King points to Lussick not being around after next year.

 

[boxhead]

Jared Waerea-Hargreaves would be a great signing, he's a good forward, highly aggressive and likely to add a greater physical presence to the team. I want a player that genuinely threatens and frightens opponents.

 

[MrT]

Re-signing Rose and King points to Lussick not being around after next year.

I wouldn't say that. He's only young and wouldn't command top dollar and you need 4 props in your top 17. Just because they re-signed 2 doesn't mean they'll let the up and comer go

 

[hineyrulz]

I wouldn't say that. He's only young and wouldn't command top dollar and you need 4 props in your top 17. Just because they re-signed 2 doesn't mean they'll let the up and comer go

Mate you'd think they'd re-sign him before the other two. Well i would King is 30 and seen better days and Rose is a handy bench player. Lussick could be anything.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

Re-signing Rose and King points to Lussick not being around after next year.

Yeah, it was just a matter of which club got him - us or the Dogs.

I wouldn't say that. He's only young and wouldn't command top dollar and you need 4 props in your top 17. Just because they re-signed 2 doesn't mean they'll let the up and comer go

They've also got Kite and Galuvao contracted for 2013. That's four.

Also, Lussick would command plenty of money due to his youth and how well he went in his debut year. We call that potential, and you do have to pay for it. He's in demand, and the laws of economics say that means his price goes up.

 

[hindy111]

Lets just see h ow it pans out- Could be a ncie little christmas present about to be announced : )

 

[Pazza]

We would have to be mad to not to re sign Fui!

 

[MrT]

Yeah, it was just a matter of which club got him - us or the Dogs.



They've also got Kite and Galuvao contracted for 2013. That's four.

Also, Lussick would command plenty of money due to his youth and how well he went in his debut year. We call that potential, and you do have to pay for it. He's in demand, and the laws of economics say that means his price goes up.

Poupou you talking about price elasticity of demand?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

That depends.

What is it exactly?

 

[MrT]

That depends.

What is it exactly?

lol sorry mate, just bringing up some old Uni economics stuff, just ignore it. Interesting no one has commented on my BJ Leilua rumour

 

[Poupou Escobar]

I just did some research, and I think I was actually talking about the inverse of price-elasticity-of-demand.

Rather than the change in demand in response to change in price, Lussick (like any commodity) exhibits a change in price in response to change in demand.

As for Leilua, we don't need him.

 

[MrT]

I just did some research, and I think I was actually talking about the inverse of price-elasticity-of-demand.

Rather than the change in demand in response to change in price, Lussick (like any commodity) exhibits a change in price in response to change in demand.

As for Leilua, we don't need him.

hahahah it's been a while, I just threw it out there. I couldn't be bothered reading up on it again.

I hope you learn't something