eloquentEEL
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,065
Maybe Pauli or his manager wanted to take a gamble on his value going up and decided to wait and test the market. Even if we want to extend our juniors, we can't force them to sign.
And if Manly (for eg) offer him 450k a season, should we match it? Why does everyone seem to think keeping a player is black and white?
FTR I think Pauli should be a priority. But I wouldn't endorse paying overs for him.
The concern with Pauli might be whether he can handle the amount of minutes he will need to produce under the new interchange rules next year.
They wont drop interchange from 10 to 6.They might go to 8 then to 6.
Pauli played a few 80 min games for us last year. I would imagine he would get fitter.Sure he played 80 or close too for wenty. Why does he need too play 80 anyhows? Wouldnt 60 mins be enough?
I cant help it that im a realist and I just call it like it is.....
And are you throwing racial variation remarks at me because your the dog and trying to drop the sent off ones self.
I find this very concerning. MMMMMMMMMMMMM
In fact I
agreed, Junior doesn't count because he has only played one game. Good to see we signed the big fella up for another year.Wicks IMO has been our best prop better than lussick-mannah-terepo.