You know you seem to claim the sea eagles are screwed cap wise ect, tell us why the dogs aren,t? This should be good considering dogs have pretty much bought a team, which anyone with half a brain knows costs more under the dap than a developed side like manly has compared to the dogs. If mqnly are screwed the dogs are so far over they should be wooden spooners for the next 10 years they'd lose that many points.
Um, pretty simple really we had a few stars we produced on the rise, ben barba is re-signed to a long deal while he is still cementing his star status so he wouldn't command 400k or so yet. and when he will he is still contracted for years.
kasiano, taupau, finucane, jackson etc all coming through and in process of extending.
barba, morris, ennis, graham, tolman, pritchard, eastwood all safetly tucked away.
with 12 off contract this year, along with the cap rise and the fact we are under the cap (before you argue we released millington after the roster was organised for 2012) also only signed gavet, graham and mcdougal when we lost idris, ryan, roberts along with a bunch of second tier players like armit, hodgson, warburton, tia kifili, paea, morrin etc which is why it was well known we are under the cap.
we also have halatau, stagg, goodwin, turner, wright, keating, mcdougal, lett etc off contract.
further more we don't have a squad with about 10 internationals. half of them on peanuts. with half the clubs prepared to pay alot more.
thanks for asking.