Is it true the Roosters have suspended Ryles?
No assistant coach should be forced to stick out their assistant coach contract when another club is offering a senior coach position to them.
Ummmm, they do.Oh ok. By that logic then let's allow playrs then to break their contracts when they get a better offerSorry, but if you are an assistant and you want that option, get it included in your contract. Don't say you will stay the course for all 3 years when you sign it, and constantly tell your boss that during the first season, but then do a complete 180 the next year. It's that kind of attitude that leads us to the farcical situation we have in rugby league wiuth contracts (oh, and yes, clubs exploit is just as much too).
Oh ok. By that logic then let's allow playrs then to break their contracts when they get a better offerSorry, but if you are an assistant and you want that option, get it included in your contract. Don't say you will stay the course for all 3 years when you sign it, and constantly tell your boss that during the first season, but then do a complete 180 the next year. It's that kind of attitude that leads us to the farcical situation we have in rugby league wiuth contracts (oh, and yes, clubs exploit is just as much too).
Just depends on the club they are assisting... thats just my opinion... the riff don't seem to have an issue letting assistants go elsewhere for a NRL coaching gig, as there was only a limited amount of spots... we just lost 2 this year, to bulldogs and warriors.. no one complained about it, and they were all open about it and supported their venture off alone.. seems that the rosters have been upset by the ryles camp even just having a look over the fence, it was enough to toss out that traitor, im sure Melbourne are sweet now after they got their man, Ryles was never going to the dragons, as much as Ciraldo was never going to the tigers, as soon as Bellamy steps away, Ryles will run that ship, and thats a really well mantained one at that..Oh ok. By that logic then let's allow playrs then to break their contracts when they get a better offerSorry, but if you are an assistant and you want that option, get it included in your contract. Don't say you will stay the course for all 3 years when you sign it, and constantly tell your boss that during the first season, but then do a complete 180 the next year. It's that kind of attitude that leads us to the farcical situation we have in rugby league wiuth contracts (oh, and yes, clubs exploit is just as much too).
Just depends on the club they are assisting... thats just my opinion... the riff don't seem to have an issue letting assistants go elsewhere for a NRL coaching gig, as there was only a limited amount of spots... we just lost 2 this year, to bulldogs and warriors.. no one complained about it, and they were all open about it and supported their venture off alone.. seems that the rosters have been upset by the ryles camp even just having a look over the fence, it was enough to toss out that traitor, im sure Melbourne are sweet now after they got their man, Ryles was never going to the dragons, as much as Ciraldo was never going to the tigers, as soon as Bellamy steps away, Ryles will run that ship, and thats a really well mantained one at that..
Dragons need a Flanagan, or Hassler, they cant have some rookie coach.
If i were the rosters i'd be happy for my assistants to get gigs elsewhere, it shows that the club is doing well with its systems
No its not, i get the whole breaking the contract is really bad business, but these gigs aren't waiting around for those assistants, theres already NRL coaches without jobs waiting to snag another one.See if you feel that way when you sign an assistant on a 3 year deal and they want to leave after 1 or at best 2. Justin Holbrook left when still under contracty (iirc) but with the club's blessing to go to the Gold Coast. Then we sign O'Brien to replace him. He was on a 3 year deal and after 1 year wanted out to go to the Knights. Begrugdingly he was released to go to the Knights. Then Ryles 2 years later.
Only assistant coach who has done it the right way is Fitzgibbon. He said he'd stay and finish his contract, which he did and then he went to the Sharks.
So its not quite the same at all.
See if you feel that way when you sign an assistant on a 3 year deal and they want to leave after 1 or at best 2. Justin Holbrook left when still under contracty (iirc) but with the club's blessing to go to the Gold Coast. Then we sign O'Brien to replace him. He was on a 3 year deal and after 1 year wanted out to go to the Knights. Begrugdingly he was released to go to the Knights. Then Ryles 2 years later.
Only assistant coach who has done it the right way is Fitzgibbon. He said he'd stay and finish his contract, which he did and then he went to the Sharks.
So its not quite the same at all.
If you don't want to lose coaches, maybe don't hire highly regarded coaches as assistants.
Oh and if you guys decide you are going to force coaches to stay out contracts instead of taking a head coaching job, good luck getting any decent coaches in the future.
Were they "high profile coaches" when signed? Nope. They were assistant coaches. Only reason people considered they had profile is due to who they had worked with. If you doubt me, go and have a look at all the mentions about whom they'd worked under before being signed as a head Coach.
Additionally look at many sports, you can't go out in many of them an actively recruit assistant coaches who are under contract to become head coaches. Only one you can, as far as I am aware, is in the NFL, and that is because it is a league wide policy that has been embedded for decades.
Anyways, I'll leave it there as, this is going off topic I suspect, if we continue.
You may notice I never wrote high profile.
Umm Mikel Arteta was an assistant coach at Man City when Arsenal signed him. He left mid season.
Dylan Brown --------> Silverwater Silverbacks
Spine coming together
1. J Hayne
6. D Brown
9. M Finau
Were they "high profile coaches" when signed? Nope. They were assistant coaches. Only reason people considered they had profile is due to who they had worked with. If you doubt me, go and have a look at all the mentions about whom they'd worked under before being signed as a head Coach.
Additionally look at many sports, you can't go out in many of them an actively recruit assistant coaches who are under contract to become head coaches. Only one you can, as far as I am aware, is in the NFL, and that is because it is a league wide policy that has been embedded for decades.
Anyways, I'll leave it there as, this is going off topic I suspect, if we continue.