Almost half the comp is going to have a crack at signing Leo, and it's not because he's ordinary.
It's because he is likely the next JFH / Moses Leota (two guys who don't blow up the stats sheet but contribute hugely to the Panthers being so good).
I will admit Leo did have some stinkers to end the year but if the alternative is letting him walk and replacing him with Josh King the club may as well fold.
Yeah, I dunno. Maybe. I don't think you win a comp throwing 800k at a bloke like Leo either. So where's the line?
Personally, I think if we have to pay a penny over $650k then he can walk - and I'm giving him a bonus 50k there from what I actually think too. As HVG said above, we have the luxury of being able to upgrade him in 2025 to sweeten the deal if there's some cap there to do it. If we can't get it done around that price then I see us walking down the exact same path we have before.
It's the "because he's likely" that we need to stop paying for. Pay for what he is now. We get burned almost every time on what "might" be. I feel like I'm forever looking at our disappointments that were signed on values for what they "will" provide to us, rather than what they
actually do provide us.
The truth of the matter is we need a juniors/recruitment pipeline (locals or otherwise, i'm not making the "locals" argument) that's strong enough that we can afford to make a hardline offer, because we're not desperate enough to overpay to begin with. Doesn't help us today, but it's what we actually need. At the end of the day, we're often the desperate party at the table when getting a deal done, and it needs to change. We need to find confidence in ourselves to replace what we lose. It's how the Panthers got to where they are, they weren't afraid to lose players (and even ejected some willingly, much to the surprise of many at the time) - because their junior pipeline just keeps pumping out replacements, or even upgrades for the ones that leave.