Ain't that truth!A week is a long time on the forum when we lose.
I usually steer clear of this place for 2-3 days after a loss....
Ain't that truth!A week is a long time on the forum when we lose.
Gee there's some cheery folk out on the forum today.
Despite our mental injury toll (Jennings, Norman, IDG, Fritchard, Peni, Bevan (back now), Taka, Brown), only for and against is keeping us out of the 8.
We aren't far away and we've recruited Kane Evans and Mitchell Moses - pretty good for less than half way though the year. Cheer up - we're one or two players away.
We're all frustrated, we're all impatient, but we're about to have a stack of home games (at a venue where, despite what many might suggest, we have a pretty good record in recent years).
Let's see how we go in the next couple of weeks before we assume we're doomed for all eternity.
Gee there's some cheery folk out on the forum today.
Despite our mental injury toll (Jennings, Norman, IDG, Fritchard, Peni, Bevan (back now), Taka, Brown), only for and against is keeping us out of the 8.
We aren't far away and we've recruited Kane Evans and Mitchell Moses - pretty good for less than half way though the year. Cheer up - we're one or two players away.
We're all frustrated, we're all impatient, but we're about to have a stack of home games (at a venue where, despite what many might suggest, we have a pretty good record in recent years).
Let's see how we go in the next couple of weeks before we assume we're doomed for all eternity.
Well no, and that's the point. At our best, we aren't far away. At our worst, we are.We weren't far away? You are kidding aren't you? We are a LONG way away from the top teams (Roosters/Melbourne) at our best.
Should we offer her a spot at the Eels? Could be handy in the prop rotation...
We could have defended better across the board, but we had one set in 13 minutes of footy. One single set. The game was over after 15 minutes regardless of scoreline, there was no way we were coming back from that level of possession against a genuine top 4 contender regardless of our pack. Why do you (and others) refuse to acknowledge that stat when you talk about how our forwards were supposedly the reason we lost the Roosters game?
You refuse to understand that one play kicker (who is not a very good long kicker anyway) is a huge concern. Norman is the obvious target for fifth tackle defenders and Guthbus can't kick anything other than a bomb.
The modern game is not just about which forward pack wins the battle as you seem to believe. That's actually a small part of winning. It's about possession and field position. If you do not have kicking options that can put the ball down the other end consistently, you do not win field position and you have a much harder time winning the game. You say our forwards are getting belted because of size or whatever. I disagree. Our forwards make enough metres, but our kicking game means that we start defending in the wrong field position without a line leading defender like IDG to give us line speed. But even if we are conceding a few too many metres as a result of line speed, conceding 45-50m from the opposing try line is much less of an issue than conceding the same from their 30. But people blame the pack, not the fact that our kickers can't bury the ball in their end.
Gee there's some cheery folk out on the forum today.
Despite our mental injury toll (Jennings, Norman, IDG, Fritchard, Peni, Bevan (back now), Taka, Brown), only for and against is keeping us out of the 8.
We aren't far away and we've recruited Kane Evans and Mitchell Moses - pretty good for less than half way though the year. Cheer up - we're one or two players away.
We're all frustrated, we're all impatient, but we're about to have a stack of home games (at a venue where, despite what many might suggest, we have a pretty good record in recent years).
Let's see how we go in the next couple of weeks before we assume we're doomed for all eternity.
Haha. Wow, three sets in a row! That sure does compare to 9/10 sets in the first 13 minutes of a footy game!
No, getting embarrassed like that happens when you never have 30% of the footy for 70 minutes.
Ok then. Explain how, with 30% of the footy, 9 sets in the first 40, a poor kicking game, and both play makers off injured at various stages of the game, we crawl back into the game.
That's because you refuse to accept that no team in the game wins that Roosters game in the same situation. Zero. None.
This isn't 1990. You do not win games with 70% possession against you. It's that simple. You can whine all you like but at the end of the day that is the overarching fact of the matter. It's not an excuse. It's the reason we lost so badly.
Alvaro is better than at least one of the bench props in every side named this weekend. To say that he shouldn't be playing NRL footy is absolutely, completely, and totally stupid.
Take out kick returns, Paulo made 18 hit ups for 132m. With Alvaro on the field he made 10 for 72. Boyd made 6 for 43. Alvaro was up in their faces smacking them every time they ran the footy, and because of him a 10m a run forward made 7m a run. But nah, he's a NSW cup player....
I get it. Alvaro is one of the new scapegoats. But it's nonsense to suggest that he isn't good enough to play NRL and it's nonsense to suggest that he wouldn't make our team at full strength. The guy is probably 3 years off his peak at 23 years old, can make big metres when needed, and tackles his fking ring off. He'll be a starting NRL prop in a couple of seasons and if it's not with us the people bitching about him now will be the first ones whinging about how we let him go.
The people that complain we don't have enough big forwards in first grade are the same people who will complain that we have too many big kids(ignorantly) in our junior system.
We dominate up our arse and shit comes out on both sides of that ledger.
Everyone knows your kicking game is extra important against the biggest packs. The way to beat them is to move the ball around, which means your halves. We have played every game this year with only one legitimate half. And won half of them.You're missing the point champ, 70% possession against you means you are struggling in a much wider area the just kicking and maybe, just maybe your kicking game is suffering much greater due to the underlining problem.
Everyone knows your kicking game is extra important against the biggest packs. The way to beat them is to move the ball around, which means your halves. We have played every game this year with only one legitimate half. And won half of them.
One of them was apparently massive, great team next year we were going to have............Well we shouldn't have much worry accounting for a bottom 4 team this weekend.
PS - Where are these other two signings you said were confirmed over a month ago?
Well we need more size........Should we offer her a spot at the Eels? Could be handy in the prop rotation...
Cronk + Smith = 2Storm won plenty of games early in the season with only one kicking half.
Cronk + Smith = 2