Noise
Coach
- Messages
- 18,171
Using what metric merkin?
Obviously not the missed tackle metric
Using what metric merkin?
I thought he lifted our intensity in defence. Plus he gave King a rest, and the merkin needed it. It was the first time since we beat the Dogs six weeks ago that he missed fewer than five tackles.1 error in f**k all minutes. He was a waste of two interchanges and added absolutely nothing in attack or defence. Massive mistake putting him in the side
I thought he lifted our intensity in defence. Plus he gave King a rest, and the merkin needed it. It was the first time since we beat the Dogs six weeks ago that he missed fewer than five tackles.
Tackles per minute merkin. This is also a strong indicator of line speed.Using what metric merkin?
He doesn't miss many unless he has to play long minutes.Obviously not the missed tackle metric
Kritchard is a better defender than Gower, especially in limited minutes. Plus King was obviously a risk of his nerve damage flaring up.
So you care little for tackle effectiveness. Effort alone is enough?Tackles per minute merkin. This is also a strong indicator of line speed.
Effort is worth more than just about anything in defence. Sure size, technique, agility and speed are important but Kritchard has all those things but one.So you care little for tackle effectiveness. Effort alone is enough?
That BA picked him so Pou has to find a positive reason to have him in the side. BA f**ked up plain and simple.Using what metric merkin?
I can't believe some of the comments here re: the 17 picked last night. IMO our forwards held their own, we simply made far too many mistakes. Norman and Moses I thought had very little impact. Compare that to Morgan's kicking game, continually giving them good field position.
Morgan's kicking game was helped by having plenty of time to kick the ball in the second half. That happened because their go forward improved as we got worn down. On the other side of the ball our own go forward trailed off which put pressure on our kicking game.
But ultimately lack of composure got us. The Asiata try was the turning point, though if we were more experienced/composed it didn't need to be.
Anyway we'll be better for the run. The following blokes played in their first finals series this year:
Radradra
Takairangi
Moses
Alvaro
King
Ma'u
Moeroa
Brown
Edwards
Terepo
Kritchard
Meanwhile, the Storm team last week had more premiership winners (five) than finals debutantes (four). The Cowboys team last night had a dozen premiership winners and only two finals debutantes.
No chance. I offered both sides of an argument and it tends to confuse the unsophisticated.With out any disrespect, You just contradicted yourself.!
If King had gone down it would've been a bigger mistake. Without Kritchard we don't have another hooker option on the bench. Meanwhile the rest of the top eight had these guys on the bench:That happened because their go forward improved as we got worn down.
On the other side of the ball our own go forward trailed off which put pressure on our kicking game.
So infact it was a mistake taking Pritchard on the bench instead of another big body.
Don't second guess the coach. He is doing no different from the other top eight coaches. In fact all those games where we only had one hooker in the 17 we were taking a much bigger risk. King and Kritchard miss too many tackles playing long minutes.Loosing Alvaro early tiered our forwards who were left. Pritchard is a small body who had no punch at all. We could of used another forward & maybe just maybe we could of continued our pressure instead of tiering.
We have a small forward pack as it is, Alvaro, Mannah, Brown. not the biggest forwards & not the fastest either. We carried a hooker, back rower (Scott) used as a middle, & 2 middles one being Terepo, again not the biggest but does provided explosiveness & speed.
I value your information & contribution to this forum although I don't agree with some of the things you say. But in this instance it was a mistake BA made bye putting Pritchard on the bench.
It wasn't the reason we lost as our mistakes did that. But it wasn't the smartest move specially after loosing Alvaro.. Just my opinion.
With out any disrespect, You just contradicted yourself.!
That happened because their go forward improved as we got worn down.
On the other side of the ball our own go forward trailed off which put pressure on our kicking game.
So infact it was a mistake taking Pritchard on the bench instead of another big body.
Loosing Alvaro early tiered our forwards who were left. Pritchard is a small body who had no punch at all. We could of used another forward & maybe just maybe we could of continued our pressure instead of tiering.
We have a small forward pack as it is, Alvaro, Mannah, Brown. not the biggest forwards & not the fastest either. We carried a hooker, back rower (Scott) used as a middle, & 2 middles one being Terepo, again not the biggest but does provided explosiveness & speed.
I value your information & contribution to this forum although I don't agree with some of the things you say. But in this instance it was a mistake BA made bye putting Pritchard on the bench.
It wasn't the reason we lost as our mistakes did that. But it wasn't the smartest move specially after loosing Alvaro.. Just my opinion.
BA didn't know that Alvaro was going to go off injured after 5 minutes.
However he did know that there was a chance King would not make it through the game due to his nerve damage.
You could make the argument then that maybe BA should have just left King out of the side completely if he was such a risk, but then remember Pritchard was only just coming back from a long-term injury himself and perhaps isn't match fit enough to last 80 minutes.
This is why it's probably a good idea not to second guess the coach (in most cases) because he has all the inside information, while we have next to none.
we will be bottom 4BA is the best coach we have had since Brian Smith. We are at the beginning of our premiership window. With a bit of luck we should be in the GF next year.