What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,035
Alright enough teasing, enough training, time to start running through holes in defensive lines!

192a0031.jpg


192a0007.jpg


192a0081.jpg
Auva'a defending at left centre, with Jennings back on the right.
 

Glenneel

Bench
Messages
3,843
Interesting that the Norman rumour only gets posted here a few hours after a similar thread was started on the nospam46 (which includes Hindy111 posted rumour above)
I'd prefer Paulo (or Boyd) to Austin. Assume Salmon or Gutho can replace Norman.
Why would/should we take one of RSs rejects who is an inferior player to Norman? Take one of his better players off him.
 
Last edited:

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,885
I'd prefer Paulo (or Boyd) to Austin. Assume Salmon or Gutho can replace Norman.
Why would/should we take one of RSs rejects who is an inferior player to Norman? Take one of his better players off him.

Does Salmon even exist ?

Salmon = Billy Rogers
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
92,035
I'd prefer Paulo (or Boyd) to Austin. Assume Salmon or Gutho can replace Norman.
Why would/should we take one of RSs rejects who is an inferior player to Norman? Take one of his better players off him.
It’s all about value (with price a big part of this), plus for contracted players it depends whom the club is willing to release.
 

emjaycee

Coach
Messages
13,890
Just wanted to check whether anyone else on here thinks that a player actually needs to want to come and play for us in order for us to sign them.

Maybe it's just me that thinks that is part of the decision.
 

Gazzamatta

Coach
Messages
15,694
Just wanted to check whether anyone else on here thinks that a player actually needs to want to come and play for us in order for us to sign them.

Maybe it's just me that thinks that is part of the decision.
The more you pay the more they "want to play for you".
 

Stevie

Bench
Messages
3,186
Just wanted to check whether anyone else on here thinks that a player actually needs to want to come and play for us in order for us to sign them.

Maybe it's just me that thinks that is part of the decision.

Totally. Drives me nuts when people just say Oh we should have signed him for this money.

WTF? Its not easy to get a player to commit, money often doesn't come into it FFS.
 

Stevie

Bench
Messages
3,186
We should just do the whole NFL method of getting them booze and laid on the stadium tour.

I'd sign where the best girls were!!
 
Messages
19,394
Janko was always a good player so what is your point of mentioning him. Unfortunately Auva'a is not a winger, can't catch and gets found out in D, and Taka not a forward, not yet, but should have spent time in Wenty first imo.

What? I was responding to a post about the quality of BA's signings. So, when he signs a good player (and with the Chooks paying a little freight) that's irrelevant?

If BA was to sign a good, big forward would that be irrelevant?
 

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
154,339
I think we are physically a good defensive team. The problem is we have periods where we drop our intensity. I suspect either the leadership in our team is poor, or we have a few personalities that actively resist leadership.
I think you have nailed it dead on, and it’s a factor of both.

Mannah has dropped his head at 12 nil and we know there are a few in the team with a reputation of doing as they please at times.

Our high intensity defence can also take it’s toll and if everyone isn’t putting in like they should you get what happened on Sunday. The weather just amplified it.
 

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,885
Just wanted to check whether anyone else on here thinks that a player actually needs to want to come and play for us in order for us to sign them.

Maybe it's just me that thinks that is part of the decision.

No, good club management can to sign any player they want.

giphy.gif
 

84 Baby

Referee
Messages
29,891
What? I was responding to a post about the quality of BA's signings. So, when he signs a good player (and with the Chooks paying a little freight) that's irrelevant?

If BA was to sign a good, big forward would that be irrelevant?
TBH I think glenny is actually a tad senile
 

Latest posts

Top