Discussion in 'Parramatta Eels' started by Gronk, Jun 21, 2016.
He'd be pretty ordinary playing in the team with the slowest play the balls in the comp.
Here's a link before you get deleted.....but it might still get deleted. Dunno where these blokes are a trusted source. They seem to be a couple of blokes on the piss.
So you're saying that due to the loss of inhibition they're more likely to be telling the truth?
I dunno mate. I just got a post deleted for quoting Hindy111's limerick. Which is probably fair enough, but had zero chance of offending or harming anybody.
It was a pretty shit limerick though.
He’s probably better off.
There once was a Hindy who boasted
Of the genius thoughts he had posted
But it's still fair to say
His posts didn't hold sway
As everyone knew he was toasted
So basically just like this forum
[QUOTE="Barry O'Speedwagon, post: 13256040,They seem to be a couple of blokes on the piss.
So what’s the difference between them and Rothfield, or any other journalist?
all bottom feeders
I still think there is a legitimate difference between a qualified journalist that works for a newspaper and someone with a website and an opinion.
But I know I am in the minority on this and I find that a little concerning.
what do bottoms eat?
Whatever bottom feeders feed them
thats exactly why some sites are filtered out and show up as nospam.........
any site that is filtered is not considered a reliable source, hence the allegation is being made by LU, so any allegation by a filtered site should be removed as its not a 3rd party allegation
Tough space for LU to navigate I imagine as there is no shortage of random shit on web sites and social media.
so bottoms have no say in what they eat?
doesn't sound right
are you into scat now
Yes I suppose it makes sense that you would be concerned, after all you're wrong so often.
Separate names with a comma.