We do know the first year was heavily subsidised by Manly.
He would've been on overs for sure but when he left us he was coming back into form. He was worth about $500k. But that was in 2015. Three years later he surely would've been on the slowdown. What price leadership though? We'll never know.
We do know. By his own admission he showed none and would piss off straight after training. In fact I would argue that that is displaying very poor leadership, when one of the most senior recruits of the past decade is brought to the club and he can't be F'ed to hang around and build proper relations with the club and players that can really only develop when someone invests more of themselves then just the bare minimum of training and game day duties. What sort of leadership and direction from a big name player is that (especially for the younger members of the squad)?
No like I said I would argue that he was a terrible influence overall. He definitely was no Petro Civoniceva who was brought for the exact same reason to the Panthers and was a brilliant leader for the entire squad or even James Graham. Now they are the type of leaders you bring to a club in desperate need of leadership. Not a bloke that after retirement goes on a podcast and swearing like a sailor drags his former club and team mate down the gutter where he already is to join him.
That has always been his personality trait and BA should have known better. Terrible leadership from BA for ever letting it happen in the first place. When it comes to personalities BA seems to have no f**ken clue. It's just flip a coin stuff.