Gary Gutful
Post Whore
- Messages
- 53,039
Mick.Who else is sick of Salmon jokes?
Mick.Who else is sick of Salmon jokes?
Haha ... good oneWho else is sick of Salmon jokes?
John WestWho else is sick of Salmon jokes?
On a scale of 1-10, I'm about a 6.Who else is sick of Salmon jokes?
Breaking contracts is never rare, Klemmer had 2 years to run and same with Napa I think. Obviously Knights never talked to Dogs about Klemmer and Dogs to Roosters about Napa. There is a history of players breaking contracts well before they expire over the years. As I say, if there's a will there'll always be a way.I hope you don’t live your life planning for rare events to save your arse.
Says the guy to still posts the nuthugger / hugger stuff...Who else is sick of Salmon jokes?
Breaking contracts is never rare, Klemmer had 2 years to run and same with Napa I think. Obviously Knights never talked to Dogs about Klemmer and Dogs to Roosters about Napa. There is a history of players breaking contracts well before they expire over the years. As I say, if there's a will there'll always be a way.
You are missing the chief orchestrators in any player move. The f**king player agents. I could almost guarantee the Klemmer/Napa moves didn't go down like you reckon they did or how you believe we should chase players. Player agents are like any other market agents. They know the general market tendencies, they gauge interest certain buyers for general targets and sellers willingness to release those targets and once those 2 measurements get close, they try to strike a deal between the required parties.Breaking contracts is never rare, Klemmer had 2 years to run and same with Napa I think. Obviously Knights never talked to Dogs about Klemmer and Dogs to Roosters about Napa. There is a history of players breaking contracts well before they expire over the years. As I say, if there's a will there'll always be a way.
Breaking contracts is never rare, Klemmer had 2 years to run and same with Napa I think. Obviously Knights never talked to Dogs about Klemmer and Dogs to Roosters about Napa. There is a history of players breaking contracts well before they expire over the years. As I say, if there's a will there'll always be a way.
Because they had leveraged their own desire to leave and gained permission to negotiate, you absolute spanner. That's exactly the point. They didn't break anything, thery were f**king released
So, tell me, why would St George give Lomax permission to negotiate?
Nah. That’s bull shit.
Contracts aren’t worth the paper they are written on.
Moylan, Cartwright,Hiku,Merrin,Cleary, Hayne,Klemmer,Holmes.
If a club doesn't want they move you on.
Because they had leveraged their own desire to leave and gained permission to negotiate, you absolute spanner. That's exactly the point. They didn't break anything, thery were f**king released
So, tell me, why would St George give Lomax permission to negotiate?
You mean that they give the contracted player permission to negotiate with other clubs.
@Glenneel thats the key point here. There has to be a will from 3 or more different parties. I never thought I would say this but I see where you are coming from but the example you have given (Napa, Klemmer, even Hayne to us the second time) are all a completely different scenarios.As I say, if there's a will there'll always be a way.
Unsure how the Duke does it. But plenty of over paid signings or re signings that he manages to get out of club and fix mistake. We seem to get stuck with ours.
Hoffman for example should of been gone. Perhaps even Taka.
Cartwright,Latu,Hiku,Merrin all on massive over yet gone once Duke knew they not worth cost he made them dissapear. Moylan was more mutual. And it never seemed to effect their cap which is odd.
Mick.
His name is the same as a breed of fish that costs $30kilo. It is just not funny.On a scale of 1-10, I'm about a 6.
king of the huggers is having a cry lolSays the guy to still posts the titty twister / hugger stuff...
Says the guy to still posts the titty twister / hugger stuff...