Eelogical
Referee
- Messages
- 23,647
The Darling would probably be cheap. You could afford to build your own golf course, have a prime river front location and you can have all the space you want.Why don’t you by me a River. By me one now!
The Darling would probably be cheap. You could afford to build your own golf course, have a prime river front location and you can have all the space you want.Why don’t you by me a River. By me one now!
The Darling would probably be cheap. You could afford to build your own golf course, have a prime river front location and you can have all the space you want.
I prefer rooibos. It's not technically tea I suppose, but very good for the anxiety that comes from being called a bitch on an internet forum
There's also the added bonus of marine biology opportunities.Yeah!
And cos it's already f**ked by all the cotton farmers, you could steal all the water you needed for your greens and just blame those merkins.
There's also the added bonus of marine biology opportunities.
I disagree. That is absolute plop, Strider. Plop!!!!Why are you merkins blabbing on endlessly? .... just step away from the thread ffs .... believe what you each want to believe, its ok if others dont
*"meditate"Rude. I'm going to go away and meditate now.
It's still possible. The trick is to stay quiet about it.Well, there's biology opportunities anyway.
We tend to look down on those river folks. Call them Swampies. We used to drown them on sight, but that's not allowed anymore. Damned PC culture!
Swamp ass.It's still possible. The trick is to stay quiet about it.
Now you want to split hairs about what is a depth signing vs a player who adds depth?He said he "adds depth", not that he was a depth signing. It's a statement that's true of any player, and could easily be said about anyone who isn't a star.
@I'm a loser baby is quite a visual person so I have taken the liberty of preparing a diagram.Now you want to split hairs about what is a depth signing vs a player who adds depth?
There is no difference. It’s a player who may or may not play first grade, depending on his form and fitness relative to other players. Just like Mahoney and Pritchard, and unlike Moses, Jennings, Paulo and Davey.
He played one game of reserve grade in three years at the Roosters. It’s more likely that 2018 is the outlier.
You know that pyramid schemes fail in the end, mate.@I'm a loser baby is quite a visual person so I have taken the liberty of preparing a diagram.
View attachment 27111
He said he "adds depth", not that he was a depth signing. It's a statement that's true of any player, and could easily be said about anyone who isn't a star.
I hope you are right. Really. because a tall, mobile forward with a good offload would be marvellous. But I think it's just as likely that he was made to look better in the Roosters team than he actually is. He's the sort of player who might do well at Melbourne (but nowhere else).
@I'm a loser baby is quite a visual person so I have taken the liberty of preparing a diagram.
View attachment 27111
I hope you are right. Really. because a tall, mobile forward with a good offload would be marvellous. But I think it's just as likely that he was made to look better in the Roosters team than he actually is. He's the sort of player who might do well at Melbourne (but nowhere else).
My mum’s dead you rude merkin.