hineyrulz
Post Whore
- Messages
- 154,137
Well you have no idea, and you are for two more years of IDG. So questions have to be asked.......So why do you reckon we re-signed him? Because the coach has no idea?
Well you have no idea, and you are for two more years of IDG. So questions have to be asked.......So why do you reckon we re-signed him? Because the coach has no idea?
I don't think there's value carrying 3 hookers in the top 25. If one of your two hookers gets injured for a few weeks, the other hooker should be able to play most of the game with someone in the 17 covering for a short stint. If it's a long term injury you bring in your back up from the second tier (what IDG should be)
I'd round out the bottom 8 in the top 25 with 3 middle forwards, 2 edge forwards, a half and 2 outside backs.
Well you have no idea, and you are for two more years of IDG. So questions have to be asked.......
why would we sign the worst dummy half in the comp for two more years??? I reckon it's a fair question.What questions are they?
We had the intention of carrying 3 hookers in our Top 25 this season and would have done for the entire season had Peats not been moved on.
why would we sign the worst dummy half in the comp for two more years??? I reckon it's a fair question.
Nope.Am I the only person who thinks that IDG is one of the best defending hookers in the comp?
De Gois should only be a backup if he stays.
Am I the only person who thinks that IDG is one of the best defending hookers in the comp?
Yep, it's not the 80's anymore. You need more than a tackling machine to challenge the top sides in the comp.Matt Keating was also one of the best defending hookers in the comp. Ask Pou, he has the stats. The problem was he was the worst attacking hooker in the comp. Just like De Gois. The game has moved away from having a little bloke who tackles his heart out and offers nothing with the ball.
Matt Keating was also one of the best defending hookers in the comp. Ask Pou, he has the stats. The problem was he was the worst attacking hooker in the comp. Just like De Gois. The game has moved away from having a little bloke who tackles his heart out and offers nothing with the ball.
Seeing as the announcement of re-signings are being done one at a time day by day are we expecting anymore announcements today or in the coming days or is that it from our current squad
The Bulldogs are still a chance of finishing Top 4 with one.
Would we have many more "re-signings" to make? Maybe Robson
What are you talking about? Lichaa offers a fair bit with the ball, especially compared to IDG. Lichaa:
3 tries
5 try assits
2 line breaks
6 line break assists
They are very good numbers and shit on plodder De Gois. Lichaa's defence is actually a lot better than De Gois' too. Lichaa has made 712 tackles with 24 missed compared to De Gois who has made 571 tackles with 47 missed.
Again, I'd say if you swapped the players teams, so De Gois at the Dogs and Lichaa at Parra, they'd have similar stats in attack. Both teams attack very differently and this has nothing to do with which player would be in the 9.
Ennis, McCullough and Lichaa are all pedestrian dummy halves and their teams are doing okay. Put them behind strong packs and they do just fine.No doubt we signed him becasue he is cheap. He is also crap. For some reason BA places little importance to the dummy half position even though all the top teams have very good or great 9s and we will again rival Newcastle as having the worst hookers in the comp next year.