84 Baby
Referee
- Messages
- 29,914
f**ken clickbaitAnyone else expect a different “scary” nickname?
f**ken clickbaitAnyone else expect a different “scary” nickname?
Who's the merkin with the ball? Hands? Yates?Greig looks super fit now. Hollis has also filled out. I reckon both could be suprise packets.
With Kafusi, Papali'i, Marata and a lesser degree Stone gone it's possible we have ready made replacements within. Rodwell will have Stone spot covered. Morreti may take Maratas....Exciting times. This is the sign of a strong system.
View attachment 57518View attachment 57519
Who's the merkin with the ball? Hands? Yates?
Like 'Bowel Destroyer'?Anyone else expect a different “scary” nickname?
Yep, it's not about the ones you lose, it's about the ones you keep. The ones you don't keep have zero relevance to the strength of your squad. They are no different to any other player who doesn't play for your club.Greig looks super fit now. Hollis has also filled out. I reckon both could be suprise packets.
With Kafusi, Papali'i, Marata and a lesser degree Stone gone it's possible we have ready made replacements within. Rodwell will have Stone spot covered. Morreti may take Maratas....Exciting times. This is the sign of a strong system.
You were right the first time. It's Rodwell.He is a lot bigger then I thought Hands. Very solid
What did the cop say to a hand? You are under a-wrist.Could be a handy pick-up..
Amongst all these posts about guy with the surname Hands, I recommend googling Kenneth PinyanLike 'Bowel Destroyer'?
I would've kept either jnr or paps.Yep, it's not about the ones you lose, it's about the ones you keep. The ones you don't keep have zero relevance to the strength of your squad. They are no different to any other player who doesn't play for your club.
The exception is the leaders who drive your culture. From a social chemistry point of view they might be very hard to replace. Other players are more easily replaceable no matter how good they are, just from a cap value perspective, if not like-for-like.
Consider someone like Papali'i. Suppose he's on $200k but giving $500k worth of footy. If you re-sign him for $600k you have the same amount of talent but now costing an extra $400k on the cap. You'll feel that elsewhere in your squad. Retaining him is a net loss. Better off spending that $600k on one or more players who are more likely to offer value. You could spend it on two players (for $300k each) who both have the potential to give you $500k worth of footy. There is far more upside, while the downside is about the same.
I'll wait until I get back to work before Googling that one.Amongst all these posts about guy with the surname Hands, I recommend googling Kenneth Pinyan
As a bit of tease, I’ll just say the horse was named Big DickI'll wait until I get back to work before Googling that one.
Good one Pete.What did the cop say to a hand? You are under a-wrist.
What did the cop say to a hand? You are under a-wrist.
It would appear so.Was the cop from New Zealand?