What if he doesn't?Could be right. But I reckon if D. Brown shows any decent improvement in TA's then he will become the hottest off contract half in the game.
We need to act now.
That depends. Do you understand yet that he is responsible for the way his manager continues to negotiate with our club?well that's your 4th different response
got anymore ?
That's because he's the perfect backup ffsI reckon we just wait to see who's available each week and of the rest who is playing well before getting too carried away about Jake. He'll get enough games without being in the first choice 17.
When he's had two hookers good enough for the top 17 he's used them both in the top 17. Think back to when we had Peats, De Gois, Pritchard and King.There is probably sufficient flexibility in the backs to accomodate Shrub on the bench.
BA never plays a hooker off the bench. He likes to flog his 9's to death and I hope he does likewise to Rheed this year.
The other 3 benchies will be pigs who BA will expect to play 8, 10, 11, 12 or 13 as required.
Our 14 usually only gets 5 or 10 mins game time each week so it probably dosent matter much either way.
Personally I like a 9 on the bench so my choice would be Rein but Id be flabbergasted if it happened.
Id suggest Lussick was equal to any of those named.When he's had two hookers good enough for the top 17 he's used them both in the top 17. Think back to when we had Peats, De Gois, Pritchard and King.
Small sample for him but that aside, there wasn't much in it.Id suggest Lussick was equal to any of those named.
NRL games by age 26 (Lussick's age):Id suggest Lussick was equal to any of those named.
Player | NRL games by age 26 |
---|---|
Peats | 103 |
De Gois | 101 |
Pritchard | 47 (despite retiring at 24) |
King | 32 |
Lussick | 10 |
Cody Walker had played 0 games by age 26. The ultimate plodder.NRL games by age 26 (Lussick's age):
Player NRL games by age 26 Peats 103 De Gois 101 Pritchard 47 (despite retiring at 24) King 32 Lussick 10
Unlike the other four, Lussick's career is still ongoing. Maybe he will get more than ten before he retires but I doubt it. He is the ultimate plodder. Lack of interest from NRL clubs supports this.
That depends. Do you understand yet that he is responsible for the way his manager continues to negotiate with our club?
if so, it would be more than 80%
Well…. yeah? His name ain’t Choady for nothingCody Walker had played 0 games by age 26. The ultimate plodder.
Obviously the “stop paying him” was a little facetious. The actual timeline would go:Do you understand that that is completely irrelevant when discussing who leaks what to the media ?
Do you also understand that if Gutho stopped paying him, as you allege being the reason for his endorsing his comments, that Gutho would be in breach of his contract ?
What if he doesn't?
You can get Covid more than once.How your NRL team is shaping up, as 80 per cent of players test positive to COVID
The Herald spoke to all 10 NSW-based clubs to find out how many of their players were yet to contract COVID.amp.smh.com.au
So looks like every parra player except nathan brown has caught covid and should be right moving forward which is probably good news.
Well at age 26 he was shit. How can you argue otherwise? No NRL clubs saw value in him until he learned to tackle.Cody Walker had played 0 games by age 26. The ultimate plodder.
I know that Gutherson needs to be satisfied with Ayoub's services or he won't renew his contract.Do you understand that that is completely irrelevant when discussing who leaks what to the media ?
Do you also understand that if Gutho stopped paying him, as you allege being the reason for his endorsing his comments, that Gutho would be in breach of his contract ?
I know that Gutherson needs to be satisfied with Ayoub's services or he won't renew his contract.