Sensei Cobra
Juniors
- Messages
- 1,758
I accept there’s flaws in my theory … this is one of themUmm but what if he accepted their offer?
I accept there’s flaws in my theory … this is one of themUmm but what if he accepted their offer?
Well then that's when the Dolphins renege and terminate the Matto deal... Don't you know? Contracts aren't worth the paper they're written on FFS!!!!Umm but what if he accepted their offer?
Ive had an inkling for a while we will lose Moses to the flippersSo what about this theory …
Dolphins offer to matto only to have us up our offer to tighten up our cap so they can come in and take Mitch
They have forwards they desperately need play makers
no source or basis whatsoever just a random theory
No, he would have been better suited to playing 9 than putting a forward in at hooker. Dumb coaching. Cost us the game.You don’t think Will Smith can drop the ball four times in a game?
No, he would have been better suited to playing 9 than putting a forward in at hooker. Dumb coaching. Cost us the game.
Those merkins refused to drive up to Avalon up until a few months ago. It’s the door dash deadshits that I’m ropable at. Didn’t leave it to chance today and picked up a case directly from the pub house in Newport.He definitely restocks my kit. @Happy MEel isn’t happy with his 4 Pines efforts thought.
I was responding to a post that listed a best 17 for 2023 from the current contracted players. It had Cartwright as right edge.I’m a bit lossed. You want Cartwright to be selected in the regular 17 or not ? Or is he down the pecking order in your opinion? Meanwhile what do you expect of him whikst playing reserve grade?
So you’d play him and tolerate his errors if you were coach?I was responding to a post that listed a best 17 for 2023 from the current contracted players. It had Cartwright as right edge.
The coaching staff have no chance of allowing Cartwright to play his natural game, and Cartwright provides nothing that most park footballers couldn't do when the coaching staff want him to play the way they want him to play. I have zero idea why either party preserves with each other. It's pointless.
I’m not saying he’s a great player but he would have been a much better option than f**king Ray stone at 9.You wouldn't see Smith do something stupid like take a kick from dummy half when the halfback was calling for it then kick it out on the full and let the opposition get momentum back to win the game..
We all thought the same when Smith screwed us over against the Storm too...I’m not saying he’s a great player but he would have been a much better option than f**king Ray stone at 9.
I wouldn't have re-signed him for two years unless I was prepared to allow him to play his natural game. Otherwise, why are we bothering?So you’d play him and tolerate his errors if you were coach?
So you’d play him and tolerate his errors if you were coach?
Surely the board selects the team.So you’d play him and tolerate his errors if you were coach?
We have a recruitment committee that includes the chairman.I must have been because I missed the announcement about how the board is now doing player recruitment. What's the point of O'Neill then?
Seriously? You're trying to suggest that the board has a substantial role in player recruitment?We have a recruitment committee that includes the chairman.
Leadership and experience count for something, merkin. Papali’i provides neither. That said, Matterson’s concussion history carries some risk.Interesting that we’re willing to go that high for Matterson but not for Papali’i.