Rumours and Stuff

[King-Gutho94]

I do remember Starford Toa gave Holmes an absolute bath that night the Tigers pulverised the Cows. I think that night he looked a little off colour like pale or white...like a powder like colour

Its a shame the drug testers were in the tigers change room instead after the game figuring out what performance enhancing substances they used to scored 66 points.

 

[yy_cheng]

I do remember Starford Toa gave Holmes an absolute bath that night the Tigers pulverised the Cows. I think that night he looked a little off colour like pale or white...like a powder like colour

Take him and his left winger mate then we'll be set

 

[Twizzle]

And still I know more than most of you except my little mate Hindy.

The world is full of dumb arses with opinions.

hi siri, give me an example of irony

 

[Matty Bhoy]

Wiremu and Dyl named in the NZ squad. Penisini in the Tongan squad.

 

[T.S Quint]

Nobody is taking it out on him. People are just sick of him trying to justify our mediocrity and just going the opposite of the majority for the sake of it. He hasn't had an original thought since he joined. Now he has been exposed as a fraud so he publicly announces that he puts people on ignore.

What a lame softcock.

Ok, come on. You seriously don’t think he’s had an original thought? I would imagine that someone who goes against the majority would be considered more original than the rest.

And what does it matter if he tries to “justify our mediocrity” as you put it? I can see where he’s coming from. He can see there are issues and tries to understand the problem. I like to think I do the same. The problem seems to be that the majority here think that these problems are easily fixed, which is probably not the case.

Phantom is more reasonable than Pou. Pou won’t concede to anything and is as annoying as a blue arsed fly on a hot summers day in a fibro house with no aircon.

If you can find a time when Phantom has conceded an argument because he was shown to be wrong, then I will gladly concede this one.

There aren’t many people on here who do, tbh. You are actually one of the few who do (but then you’ll just change you mind back again a week later).

 

[Avenger]

Ok, come on. You seriously don’t think he’s had an original thought? I would imagine that someone who goes against the majority would be considered more original than the rest.

And what does it matter if he tries to “justify our mediocrity” as you put it? I can see where he’s coming from. He can see there are issues and tries to understand the problem. I like to think I do the same. The problem seems to be that the majority here think that these problems are easily fixed, which is probably not the case.



If you can find a time when Phantom has conceded an argument because he was shown to be wrong, then I will gladly concede this one.

There aren’t many people on here who do, tbh. You are actually one of the few who do (but then you’ll just change you mind back again a week later).

Maybe I should have said his ‘own thought’ I reckon going against the herd at all times makes him sound argumentative for the sake of it. Last week everyone felt sorry for Danika Mason and then he suggested that they may have split because she was a bitch. I doubt that was his own thought but he just said it to create arguments and controversy.

 

[T.S Quint]

Maybe I should have said his ‘own thought’ I reckon going against the herd at all times makes him sound argumentative for the sake of it. Last week everyone felt sorry for Danika Mason and then he suggested that they may have split because she was a bitch. I doubt that was his own thought but he just said it to create arguments and controversy.

I don’t think he goes against the majority for the sake of it. I think he believes what he says.
I quite often agree with him (not always) and I’m happy to argue my point. I don’t catch as much vitriol as he does though, so I guess you guys just don’t like the way he argues. Which is fine, but argue the point instead of attacking him as a person. I mean you literally accused him of being on the spectrum the other day for no other reason than you just don’t agree with him.

The Danika thing I thought might have just been a joke. But even if it wasn’t, I was the one who threw out that the bloke was cheating, without knowing anything about the situation. He had every right to say the complete opposite, because it was just as likely.

 

[emjaycee]

I don’t think he goes against the majority for the sake of it. I think he believes what he says.
I quite often agree with him (not always) and I’m happy to argue my point. I don’t catch as much vitriol as he does though, so I guess you guys just don’t like the way he argues. Which is fine, but argue the point instead of attacking him as a person. I mean you literally accused him of being on the spectrum the other day for no other reason than you just don’t agree with him.

The Danika thing I thought might have just been a joke. But even if it wasn’t, I was the one who threw out that the bloke was cheating, without knowing anything about the situation. He had every right to say the complete opposite, because it was just as likely.

Seriously, do you even LU Parra anymore?

 

[T.S Quint]

Seriously, do you even LU Parra anymore?

I’ve been LUing for 13 years now.
Have I been doing it wrong this whole time?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

I do remember Starford Toa gave Holmes an absolute bath that night the Tigers pulverised the Cows. I think that night he looked a little off colour like pale or white...like a powder like colour

Looking a little beige around the nostrils?

 

[emjaycee]

I’ve been LUing for 13 years now.
Have I been doing it wrong this whole time?

Maybe, I mean you posted two rational and logical comments in the one post and that is simply unheard of in here most days.

 

[T.S Quint]

Maybe, I mean you posted two rational and logical comments in the one post and that is simply unheard of in here most days.

I knew I shouldn’t have LU’d sober and happy.

 

[JokerEel]

I don’t think he goes against the majority for the sake of it. I think he believes what he says.
I quite often agree with him (not always) and I’m happy to argue my point. I don’t catch as much vitriol as he does though, so I guess you guys just don’t like the way he argues. Which is fine, but argue the point instead of attacking him as a person. I mean you literally accused him of being on the spectrum the other day for no other reason than you just don’t agree with him.

The Danika thing I thought might have just been a joke. But even if it wasn’t, I was the one who threw out that the bloke was cheating, without knowing anything about the situation. He had every right to say the complete opposite, because it was just as likely.

The problem with the guy is he is arguing for the sake of it.

Most of the time people question why the club is doing something a certain way.. eg purchasing players. He has to chime in with a response as to what we already know yes the club needs 30 players yes the club has a salary cap yes we need players that are not world beaters. But he continues to argue the same stupid shit and now has started to block people because we are over his replies.

I dont agree with the attacking the man and he is quite knowledgeable but he needs to think outside the box...

 

[Noise]

He’s been calling the whole forum dumb for over a decade because he thinks he is the smartest person on here and then sooks when people return serve.

 

[Avenger]

I don’t think he goes against the majority for the sake of it. I think he believes what he says.
I quite often agree with him (not always) and I’m happy to argue my point. I don’t catch as much vitriol as he does though, so I guess you guys just don’t like the way he argues. Which is fine, but argue the point instead of attacking him as a person. I mean you literally accused him of being on the spectrum the other day for no other reason than you just don’t agree with him.

The Danika thing I thought might have just been a joke. But even if it wasn’t, I was the one who threw out that the bloke was cheating, without knowing anything about the situation. He had every right to say the complete opposite, because it was just as likely.

I suggested that he was on the spectrum because he is fixated on playing continual devils advocate not that he was impaired. You realise Rainman was highly intelligent don’t you and I there is no way Pou is a dope quite the contrary but he is fixated with polishing turds and fighting for mediocrity.

There can be no argument there.

 

[emjaycee]

I think Pou just likes to think and post in a rational (non-emotive) way and that irks posters who are more passionate in their posts.

 

[Avenger]

He’s been calling the whole forum dumb for over a decade because he thinks he is the smartest person on here and then sooks when people return serve.

 

[Avenger]

I think Pou just likes to think and post in a rational (non-emotive) way and that irks posters who are more passionate in their posts.

Nothing rational about always volunteering to be on the wrong side of the debating team.

 

[yy_cheng]

Can anyone add it to the Referendum whether Pou should post or not?

 

[Poupou Escobar]

I think Pou just likes to think and post in a rational (non-emotive) way and that irks posters who are more passionate in their posts.

I’m like the Rain Man of the forum. Cool, calm and collected. But when merkins misrepresent me or call me a troll it’s like when Charlie Babbitt ran the bath too hot.