Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Understand you like Lenaz, but in reality he’s a basic workhorse like Yates. We have better and younger players than Lenaz in the system . Mind you, that’s just my opinion
Maybe I do too. Did you ever try and assume that?
Guttered Lenaz has left as he was so tough and a great defender. He will turn out to be better than Yates no question.
Matt Arthur is talented and a great kid however he will have similar problems to his father when he was graded.
Baldness?
His hair will start falling out?!
If he was good enough for the top 30 last year and this year, why wouldn’t he be good enough in another two years?
Because we have seen him play.
And a 21-year-old still playing Flegg doesn’t exactly scream potential. Especially when his best quality is toil.
There’s nothing wrong with his play. He is a quality reserve grader. Versatile with good defence. There are plenty of worse players on top 30 contracts.
