Parra Pride
Referee
- Messages
- 20,440
I really just can't wrap my head around the logic here. If the Dragons have agreed to end his contract for the next two seasons then he isn't under contract, so why would anyone be forced to carry this imaginary value on their cap if he signs for less than what he would have been getting? I'd almost guarantee this rule wouldn't exist if he was going to the Roosters or the Broncos.NRL rules do not allow contracted players to move clubs for less money than they are worth under the salary cap.
Arthur declined to comment on negotiations with Lomax. But Eels sources, speaking on the condition of anonymity due to the confidential nature of talks, indicated that the club’s offer will be worth around $650,000 – $700,000.
The NRL has indicated that any difference between Lomax’s Dragons deal and a Parramatta contract would typically be carried in the Eels’ cap as his new club.