What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

JokerEel

Coach
Messages
13,260
We should only sign staff who promise a win rate over 85%. I wonder if Ryles or Hannay came up with the bigger number?


We should sign a coach who wants to improve the defense to be a dominant side...


YearPositionPoints ForPoints For Per GamePoints againstPoints Against Per GameFor & AgainstGames
201410th47719.958024.2-10324
201512th44818.757323.9-12524
201614th29812.432413.5-2624
20174th49620.745719.03924
2018Last37415.655022.9-17624
20195th53322.247319.76024
20203rd39219.628814.410420
20216th56623.645719.010924
20224th60825.348920.411924
202311th54324.752223.72122
202417th28320.240428.9-12114
20098th47621.647321.5322
 

lucablight

First Grade
Messages
6,494
Premierships and high win rate are both a product of being competitive. Win rate is granular so a better way to measure a team than premierships, especially over a very short time frame like six years.

Otherwise why are merkins pissing and moaning over missing the finals? We are no worse than the other 15 teams that don’t win the comp ffs
Win rate is fine if you were a struggling team looking to move up the ladder because it’s a tangible improvement. However, eventually a playing group or coaching setup will reach a point where that’s not enough and you need to be challenging for premierships or something has to change.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,107
We should sign a coach who wants to improve the defense to be a dominant side...


YearPositionPoints ForPoints For Per GamePoints againstPoints Against Per GameFor & AgainstGames
201410th47719.958024.2-10324
201512th44818.757323.9-12524
201614th29812.432413.5-2624
20174th49620.745719.03924
2018Last37415.655022.9-17624
20195th53322.247319.76024
20203rd39219.628814.410420
20216th56623.645719.010924
20224th60825.348920.411924
202311th54324.752223.72122
202417th28320.240428.9-12114
20098th47621.647321.5322
We should get the coach we had in 2016 or 2020.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,107
Win rate is fine if you were a struggling team looking to move up the ladder because it’s a tangible improvement. However, eventually a playing group or coaching setup will reach a point where that’s not enough and you need to be challenging for premierships or something has to change.
What shows you’re challenging for premierships? What’s the objective measure other than premierships?
 

Tiger5150

Bench
Messages
3,756
Where did you get this 4-5 year rebuild figure then?
It is my opinion that your rebuild will take 3-4 years. You need to change the front office, you will pick a new coach this year, it will take him a year to work out the wheat from the chaff in the squad, it will take him a minimum of 18months to clear out the squad and rebuild it...3-4 years at best.
 

Pazza

First Grade
Messages
9,753
It is my opinion that your rebuild will take 3-4 years. You need to change the front office, you will pick a new coach this year, it will take him a year to work out the wheat from the chaff in the squad, it will take him a minimum of 18months to clear out the squad and rebuild it...3-4 years at best.

nah, we got quality in the key positions, some good young players coming through.

better call it a re tooling than a re build
 

Pazza

First Grade
Messages
9,753
Quality that has taken us to last place.

i know this team hasnt performed well this year but you cant deny that moving forward we got a strong core of players. we need some better coaching, improve our defense, so yes we need a few new players but the idea that we need to get rid of everyone and arnet going to see any success over a next few year i just dont believe
 

Noise

Coach
Messages
18,155
i know this team hasnt performed well this year but you cant deny that moving forward we got a strong core of players. we need some better coaching, improve our defense, so yes we need a few new players but the idea that we need to get rid of everyone and arnet going to see any success over a next few year i just dont believe
I am going to deny we have a strong core of players. Most of our current players are either ageing, regressing or just flat out reserve graders. With the decline due to age of most of our core players along with their long term contracts we are going to be in a world of pain for some time.
 

Pazza

First Grade
Messages
9,753
I am going to deny we have a strong core of players. Most of our current players are either ageing, regressing or just flat out reserve graders. With the decline due to age of most of our core players along with their long term contracts we are going to be in a world of pain for some time.

we have Moses, Brown, Hopgood, Penisini, Lomax, Gutherson, RCG, Talented youngers like MA and Blaize. we got 16 players off contract at the end of 2025.

all im saying is we dont need a 4 - 5 year 'rebuild' to be successful. if things go our way like we nail the head coach hire, the young guys we have turn into serviceable FGers and we sign another decent player. theres no reason we cant be successful next year.
 

Latest posts

Top