hindy111
Post Whore
- Messages
- 62,867
We would have been too tired from the nth qld game anyway.
100% The humidity from that game is 12-18mths recover minimum
We would have been too tired from the nth qld game anyway.
Hopefully the boys will be finally ready by round 1 next season. Poor BA never had a chance the last 2 seasons.100% The humidity from that game is 12-18mths recover minimum
I think we're both taking a guess, mate.
I heard it was the other way around.I'm not suggesting they are correct but from what was sourced here at the time, we offered $400K and Panfers $550K
there may be other sources with conflicting numbers, who knows
I heard it was the other way around.
1st day of our off season. Bring on the rumours and signing and general excitement!
We also beat Manly and the Cowboys, and smashed the Bulldogs. Either way, coaching has little impact on individual games. It has a strategic effect. What this means is that Barrett’s results were more down to Arthur, since he was the coach during preseason and for many years leading up to it. And you should be happy with that idea, because our results under Barrett were garbage.It's all irrelevant our performances under Arthur were downright putrid this year compared to what we dished up under Barrett.
Canberra, Dolphins in Darwin, Magic Round and I'll throw in the Tigers at Commbank where we offered sfa in attack against the worst defensive side in the comp.
What excuses can you offer up for those games.
When Arthur had better players at his disposal then what Baz had to deal with in the back end.
Hopgood, Paulo, Matterson, Moses, Sivo for an extended period, Simmonson were all missing for a large majority of Barrett's stint.
Outside of Moses all of them were available and playing under Arthur in those first 10 games.
I reckon our worst performance under Barrett was probably the Chooks at Allianz and seriously was anyone expecting us to get within 30 anyway.
Under Barrett we were still in 80% games in the final 10 mins. Some dumb football and shithouse defensive lapses cost us probably 4 games.
It’s the secret to winning grand finalsA bus to a GF would be a good idea??
We also beat Manly and the Cowboys, and smashed the Bulldogs. Either way, coaching has little impact on individual games. It has a strategic effect. What this means is that Barrett’s results were more down to Arthur, since he was the coach during preseason and for many years leading up to it. And you should be happy with that idea, because our results under Barrett were garbage.
They are the only outside chance of stopping the Storm. It will be 5yrs that one of those 2 have won it.
NRL is getting boring. But like EPL
I'm not suggesting they are correct but from what was sourced here at the time, we offered $400K and Panfers $550K
there may be other sources with conflicting numbers, who knows ?
100% The humidity from that game is 12-18mths recover minimum
Right but does that mean it was Flanagan’s fault? The players are the ones winning and losing games, and some things can’t be fixed by coaching. I’d say plenty of things. The senior players are more influential than coaches, which is why they get paid more.Ryles was quoted off the record he would walk over broken glass to get the parra job.
He had the Dragons gig locked in 18 months ago. Being an ex player he would have known what he was walking into but opted against it at the last minute.
Flanagan on the other hand was desperate due to reputation damage he had to grab any gig possible.
Flanno did a decent job with the squad he had at his disposal it was basically BA 2014 at Parra really.
Punched above there weight but got flogged numerous times and choked in the last 2 games to miss the finals by 1 game.
Brandy is super biased against Parra and genuinely can’t help himself.
Even the Cowboys struggle after playing there in September.100% The humidity from that game is 12-18mths recover minimum