What's new
By:
Advanced search…
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

hineyrulz

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
153,405
Poupou Escobar said:
The Leeds results were hardly a failure. He had ten games to get them into the top six and half of those games were against the best three sides (Wigan twice, Hull KR twice and Warrington). So they were 1 from 5 against better sides and 4 from 5 against equal-or-worse opponents. If they managed that over 27 rounds they would've made the finals. Over a small sample of ten games it wasn't enough because the distribution of stronger to equal/weaker opponents was skewed against them.
Click to expand...


Pop Tv Love GIF by Schitt's Creek
 
Gronk

Gronk

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
77,351
Avenger said:
You’re supposed to be a moderator but love fueling the fire to every topic. You’re a disgrace.
.
Click to expand...
No, there are people on here who think that they are entitled to treat others like dog shit. It doesn’t matter if you are Pou or Suity or Eele or a random drop in, you deserve respect.

The Law Talkin Guy does nothing other than drop in, trash talk and leave. If you think that he/she/they needs to be defended, then I guess that’s on you. Personally I think it’s poor form.
 
hineyrulz

hineyrulz

Post Whore
Messages
153,405
Gronk said:
No, there are people on here who think that they are entitled to treat others like dog shit. It doesn’t matter if you are Pou or Suity or Eele or a random drop in, you deserve respect.

The Law Talkin Guy does nothing other than drop in, trash talk and leave. If you think that he/she/they needs to be defended, then I guess that’s on you. Personally I think it’s poor form.
Click to expand...
1726915260579.gif
 
L

Legal Eel

Juniors
Messages
973
Gronk said:
No, there are people on here who think that they are entitled to treat others like dog shit. It doesn’t matter if you are Pou or Suity or Eele or a random drop in, you deserve respect.

The Law Talkin Guy does nothing other than drop in, trash talk and leave. If you think that he/she/they needs to be defended, then I guess that’s on you. Personally I think it’s poor form.
Click to expand...
I like the Lionel Hudz reference
 
The Predictor

The Predictor

Juniors
Messages
1,991
Gronk said:
No, there are people on here who think that they are entitled to treat others like dog shit. It doesn’t matter if you are Pou or Suity or Eele or a random drop in, you deserve respect.

The Law Talkin Guy does nothing other than drop in, trash talk and leave. If you think that he/she/they needs to be defended, then I guess that’s on you. Personally I think it’s poor form.
Click to expand...
I don’t think you’re very nice on this, and more often than not u very vocal and aggressive, therefore part of the problem not the solution
 
King-Gutho94

King-Gutho94

Coach
Messages
15,147
Poupou Escobar said:
The Leeds results were hardly a failure. He had ten games to get them into the top six and half of those games were against the best three sides (Wigan twice, Hull KR twice and Warrington). So they were 1 from 5 against better sides and 4 from 5 against equal-or-worse opponents. If they managed that over 27 rounds they would've made the finals. Over a small sample of ten games it wasn't enough because the distribution of stronger to equal/weaker opponents was skewed against them.
Click to expand...
Gee whiz you dribble shit.

What you just said is completely irrelevant they missed the finals

So hop on train to nowhere and go riddance to the Arthur clan
 
L

lucablight

First Grade
Messages
6,486
Poupou Escobar said:
The Leeds results were hardly a failure. He had ten games to get them into the top six and half of those games were against the best three sides (Wigan twice, Hull KR twice and Warrington). So they were 1 from 5 against better sides and 4 from 5 against equal-or-worse opponents. If they managed that over 27 rounds they would've made the finals. Over a small sample of ten games it wasn't enough because the distribution of stronger to equal/weaker opponents was skewed against them.
Click to expand...
I always think the argument about “but they played the best sides” to be entirely unconvincing. Figuring out how to get your team to beat stronger sides than them is part of the coaches job. Upsets do happen in sports.
 
Poupou Escobar

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,009
King-Gutho94 said:
Gee whiz you dribble shit.

What you just said is completely irrelevant they missed the finals

So hop on train to nowhere and go riddance to the Arthur clan
Click to expand...
They were already going to miss the finals based on their first 17 games. That’s why they sacked the coach, then signed Arthur. Then they extended him.
 
Poupou Escobar

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
91,009
lucablight said:
I always think the argument about “but they played the best sides” to be entirely unconvincing. Figuring out how to get your team to beat stronger sides than them is part of the coaches job. Upsets do happen in sports.
Click to expand...
Well he did beat one of the best sides. How many upsets was he supposed to achieve ffs? If a superior opponent plays their best they will beat you. There’s nothing for the coach to figure out. Upsets happen because the weaker team played their best and their opponent didn’t. There’s no magic coaching button that gets a weaker team to beat a better one. It’s up to the stronger team not to shit the bed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Top