Tiger5150
Bench
- Messages
- 3,702
Except for, you know, the law. Trading while knowingly insolvent lands you in gaol. So there is that need."There wasn't any need for North Sydney to go into administration, they were not insolvent," said Hill, who later headed the Save The Bears movement, which attempted to stop the ill-fated merger with Manly to form the Northern Eagles.
No they were insolvent because their debts far exceeded their assets and that is simply insolvency and its illegal to continue operating. If you have "friends" or 6 of 9 board members on the board of a different company that has money doesnt make you not insolvent."The reason they were not insolvent is because at the time the North Sydney Football Club, which declared itself insolvent, had six of the nine board members of the leagues club, which was awash with money."
No basically, if North Sydney could run an organisation without plunging into massive debt they would have survived. They went broke pure and simple and trying to rationalise with Central Coast stadium or SL is revisionism.So basically if the stadium was ready on-time for start of 1999 my assumption is the Bears would have survived and parked themselves permanently as a single entity on the Coast.
The Bears have no one to blame but themselves.