BA has been saying 'chase the collision' for years regardless of his assistants. Go figure, according to you, he was stuck in the past by outdated tactics that failed us for one and half years until sacked.
You’re the one stuck in the past if you think chase the collision refers to tactics. If you knew anything about professional sports you’d recognise it as an example of a mantra, which is used to help athletes focus on a specific area of their game.
In this example it was likely used to help our players improve their aggression and work rate in defence, which has been an area of weakness for our team.
Why wouldn't the coach have sole decision on what players they want. It is then up to R & R Committee if they can get them. You can't have R & R being independent of coach, that's just stupid thinking.
Because if you ask coaches which players they want they will all come up with the same list of players (“The best ones ffs!”). Identifying good players is the easy part. The hard part is negotiating their contracts and fitting them under the cap.
You're right that it would be stupid to have recruitment and retention completely independent of the coach, but it would also be stupid to put all the responsibility on him. There would be a very clear conflict of interest for one thing. Another reason is that he could get the club into very serious cap trouble that would last beyond his tenure at the club.
At Parra, MON said the coach tells them how he wants the team to play, and the list management group recruits players who will fit into that style. I've read that coaches might also have veto power over any signing decision, which makes sense. But that also might lead to a situation where the club doesn't have enough top 30 players because the coach doesn't want any of the players that are available on the market. So the list management group is there to take a big picture, dispassionate view of the squad.
You don't think Ryles didn't have a plan? I would suggest he had it all written down in file which he presented to board when being interviewed. That's what I'd do with previous experience and letters of recommendation included and suggest that is what any decent coach would do.
I'm sure every coach has a plan. It is a basic bitch part of any job that requires medium to long term decision making.
As per previous, Ryles imo would've had holistic plan for organisation from juniors up, his wish list, and board gave him job on proviso plan carried out. That's my take but you'll have another for sure.
I agree, but I don't think pathways are part of his job. He would get a say on which pathways players he will accept into the full-time squad but apart from that he already has a job that will require a lot more than 40 hours a week. Why load up a rookie coach with more responsibilities when there's an entire staff dedicated to pathways? I believe we have a bunch of fulltime pathways staff for the first time in the club's history. That's pretty cool and a great sign of our growth as a club.