What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

hindy111

Post Whore
Messages
62,944
fYKb3nt1K6sA69mssUE7yBPJbBr2GnUB9aP67OEA1Bs.gif

I'd dream of having that powerfull a blow
 

Glenneel

Bench
Messages
3,805
Because they had leveraged their own desire to leave and gained permission to negotiate, you absolute spanner. That's exactly the point. They didn't break anything, thery were f**king released

So, tell me, why would St George give Lomax permission to negotiate?
Poor old Bazal, saying the same thing. Do you know anything about contract law? Of course the club has to agree to a player breaking his contract so he can be released. Its not the player just deciding he'd like to play elsewhere so off he goes.

I'm assuming a club would go to the player's agent and ask his contract status, then suggest 'That's too bad. We were offering a guaranteed first grade spot and a substantial upgrade. That's all right we'll wait until next year when we can legally talk to him.' Nothing really offered, but clubs know agents are greedy. They'd then go to their player and say an 'offer' has been made, 'are you interested?' If the player is the agent would them go to the club and make a proposal. Things would progress from there, that is how I assume Klemmer and Napa probably started.
 
Top