Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
No, but I’m actually starting to think that he may be f**king you…
You will be rewarded for your valour in Pou heaven - well done loyal servant
I don't believe you've only just started thinking about that sort of thing.
Looks like they've found more resources in general now the CoE is paid for. From the recent Sarantinos/O'Neill interview, regarding pathways investment:
I think he said May 23 since options have been included in contracts.
www.foxsports.com.au
Yep, I’d say it’s more likely that they’ve realised it’s more worthwhile letting players leave and replacing them than being held over a barrel with these POs.
I was going but decided to spend the week away fishing instead. Would have been good to hear from Ryles and Beach.
Yeah it couldn’t be it’s a just a shit way of doing things and the club is going away from them??
This article is very exciting!!Glowing praise for Ryles.
Lomax’s hilarious first impression of Ryles as Eels recruit opens up on Moses’ role in Dragons switch
Lomax’s hilarious first impression of Ryles as Eels recruit opens up on Moses’ role in Dragons switch
They're free to leave because they're off contract, not because of the PO. The PO does the opposite. It means they are free to stay even if we don't want them, e.g. Dunster.
If it means you get players for cheaper why wouldn't you use them. Unless they found another way to get them for less under the cap.
