What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rumours and Stuff

Zoso

Juniors
Messages
665
That is simply complete garbage. The Reserve Bank has only one lever, monetary policy. They can simply only control reference interest rates and they do so to REDUCE inflation and therefore reduce the "systematic devaluation of spending power". The Reserve Bank is doing the opposite of what you are saying.


Mate you have no idea what you are talking about. The Reserve Banks policies dont encourage speculation. The Federal Governments policy of negative gearing does though.
The RBA could use that power to reduce inflation to zero. That would have its own consequences but it can. Garbage you say? Here’s a screenshot from their website. They literally say they have a ‘flexible inflation target’.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6020.jpeg
    IMG_6020.jpeg
    272.1 KB · Views: 3

Tiger5150

First Grade
Messages
5,562
The RBA could use that power to reduce inflation to zero. That would have its own consequences but it can. Garbage you say? Here’s a screenshot from their website. They literally say they have a ‘flexible inflation target’.
Government Fiscal policy impacts inflation by increasing the amount of money in the economy, Reserve Bank monetary policy reduces inflation by taking money out of the economy. When they do so, they INCREASE interest, incentivising savings and disincentivising speculation.

Reserve Bank removing money from the economy, to reduce inflation does NOT incentivise speculation.
 

Zoso

Juniors
Messages
665
Government Fiscal policy impacts inflation by increasing the amount of money in the economy, Reserve Bank monetary policy reduces inflation by taking money out of the economy. When they do so, they INCREASE interest, incentivising savings and disincentivising speculation.

Reserve Bank removing money from the economy, to reduce inflation does NOT incentivise speculation.
No disagreement about fiscal policy on inflation and immigration on house prices.
I disagree about speculation and we can agree to disagree. But speak to anyone schooled in finance (myself included, professionally) and they will say the way to offset inflation is to invest (speculate) in growth assets.
I said the RBA had a ‘target inflation rate’. You said garbage and asserted I didn’t know what I was talking about. I showed evidence to the contrary directly from The RBA. Care to take back your assertion?
 

Hindmarshisgod2

Juniors
Messages
1,767
Look I am not a fan of Nelson, at all. But. If he came in all guns and ammo and we have a clear plan to bash some big teams for the opening 20mins I’m ok with it. I honestly, really trust Ryles.

Not suggesting Nas but an intimidating agitator in the middle would be great.

You?
I love Nelson. I really hope we get him. He is exactly what we need.

Remember, everyone on here was against signing addo carr....but look how it turned out.
 

Tiger5150

First Grade
Messages
5,562
No disagreement about fiscal policy on inflation and immigration on house prices.
Good, that is the whole point
I disagree about speculation and we can agree to disagree. But speak to anyone schooled in finance (myself included, professionally) and they will say the way to offset inflation is to invest (speculate) in growth assets.
I said the RBA had a ‘target inflation rate’. You said garbage and asserted I didn’t know what I was talking about. I showed evidence to the contrary directly from The RBA. Care to take back your assertion?
I didnt say it was garbage that RBA had a 'target inflation rate' I said your statement that " It is a systematic devaluation of spending power. Therefore, saving produces negative net returns for most people, after tax and inflation." is garbage and it is. The RBA literally increases interest, therefore increasing returns on savings and incentivising savings and literally increases costs on property speculation (increased interest rates).
 

Hindmarshisgod2

Juniors
Messages
1,767
They love your posts. Otherwise they’d block you. But because they’re spineless halfwits, they’d rather whinge incessantly and throw personal insults. That’s what cowards do.

And this isn’t a pro-Pou post, it’s an anti-turning this forum into a haven for whining bitches who are either too stupid to hit ignore or are gluttons for punishment post.

I’m not reading replies to this because I have no interest in engaging in this childish shit. Grow the f**k up and stop clogging this forum with utter shit.
Well said.

I dont get why people need to get agitated on a forum. It should be an outlet for discussion, and pou provides plenty of logic in his posts. I don't get why people can't scroll past and move on with thier lives if they don't agree...
 

Zoso

Juniors
Messages
665
Good, that is the whole point

I didnt say it was garbage that RBA had a 'target inflation rate' I said your statement that " It is a systematic devaluation of spending power. Therefore, saving produces negative net returns for most people, after tax and inflation." is garbage and it is. The RBA literally increases interest, therefore increasing returns on savings and incentivising savings and literally increases costs on property speculation (increased interest rates).
Inflation, if caused by fiscal policy (which we agree it is), and is allowed to remain at 2-3% (as opposed to zero), then that is systematic and does reduce purchasing power. By your own argument, if the RBA raised rates to bring inflation to zero that would encourage even more savings, in risk free cash. I suggest (yep, I’m speculating) higher interest rates with zero inflation would reduce investment/speculation in shares, property, bitcoin, gold. (Virtually the whole basis of gold investing, for example, is to offset govt caused inflation).
On that point we disagree and neither of us will change so let’s leave it there…we’re arguing economics on a footy forum.
 

Suitman

Post Whore
Messages
57,739
Yep plenty of us were very keen on JAC

Indeed.
My gut feeling was that JAC would be a great signing because Ryles had worked with him before and would know how to give him his last chance and pull him into line.
Little did I know how disciplined Ryles would be as a coach this season and how much he would change our style of play to be more in line with successful clubs of years gone by.
It has been such a pleasant change to see Parra play modern day football this season instead of the continual tactics from 10 seasons ago that have bored us all to tears.
 

King-Gutho94

Referee
Messages
20,253
If you look at this wallabies crowd you can see how cool it looks if a lot of the crowd wears yellow/gold. We need to have a game the players and club promote that we all wear yellow shirts/jerseys.
We are the only RL team that can do this because yellow is by far the best color to use as it stands out like dogs balls and only the Eels have the yellow jersey.
It is lazy to not have brought this in years ago when I called for it.
How does a team lose a game scoring 4 tries to 1

What a garbage sport

At least when they crossed to the Argentinean girls in the crowd during the coverage made it more watchable.
 
Top