- Messages
- 47,627
Jeez, he really did.
I'd feel bad for him if he weren't the main cause for today's debacle.
I'd feel bad for him if he weren't the main cause for today's debacle.
http://www.newcastleknights.com.au/news/2015/04/25/round_8_post_match_p.html
Post match, Gidley sounds like a broken man.
http://www.newcastleknights.com.au/news/2015/04/25/round_8_post_match_p.html
Post match, Gidley sounds like a broken man.
As bad as it was, it's not even the worst by a Knights player.
That is reserved for Greg Smith.
I was there that day and it was tragic.
Now it could be the worst for any player having player 200 plus games.
http://www.newcastleknights.com.au/news/2015/04/25/round_8_post_match_p.html
Post match, Gidley sounds like a broken man.
As bad as it was, it's not even the worst by a Knights player.
That is reserved for Greg Smith.
I was there that day and it was tragic.
Now it could be the worst for any player having player 200 plus games.
I didn't see it that way, more that he just saw it as one of those days, a couple of days moping around the house and he'll be right as rain.
The only fair dinkum thing in that entire pantomime was when Stone called out his royal f**kup.
The rest was two blokes who won't or can't face reality. They assume that a team that has dropped 4 straight games and has looked clueless will somehow right itself.
As bad as it was, it's not even the worst by a Knights player.
That is reserved for Greg Smith.
I was there that day and it was tragic.
Now it could be the worst for any player having player 200 plus games.
Right now he's odds on to get another deal.
He will go away and say that he still thinks he can contribute and they will offer him a 2 yr deal.
Of course you can't see it any other way, too stubborn to see it from any other view than the most depressing, hopeless, pathetic one.
Love the quote from gidley in the press conference... Something along the lines of "it seemed like the more I tried, the more errors I made"....... Has he really only just figured this out?
Swarzey, I wish it was different but frankly, it ain't and hoping it will fix itself it's helpful.
Right now there isn't a single voice of reality in that club.
It's run like a family business and typically they are the last to embrace change irrespective of whether their very future depends on it.
I am dealing with exactly that at the moment, I am trying to save a family business from itself and unfortunately tough calls need to be made and hiding from them doesn't make it easier.
The board are supposed to be the adults in this instance but no one seems to want to take Stone aside and give him the facts of the matter.
Just look at recruitment, we've signed Sione and his brothers, but don't know where to play them, we've signed Gagai but can't get him the ball, it seems that we'll happily sign Gids if he decides he wants to play, we've lost Scott, Smith is fading fast and one of the next signing priorities is Mamo? How many outside backs do we really need? We've had a deficiency in the front row for 5 plus years and zero movement in that area, in 2016 the only back rower worth feeding will be Rochow, so we get ready to sign another outside back.
In all seriousness, where the **** is the recruitment strategy.
Additionally, the Gids situation is a joke, he shouldn't be making that decision, irrespective of how many games he played for the club. Today somebody should be telling him it's time.
We've had three change agents at the club, Ryan and Smith got driven out by vested interests to the long term detrement of the club and I actually think that Bennett eventually realised that it was a basket case and just decided to move on.
In the case of the coach, we didn't take the brave option and bring in new blood, we again took the soft option.
Doesn't anyone aspire to winning a comp anymore, don't you?
If we do, we just can't keep making the same mistakes every single year, and we just can't keep recycling insiders because they are in the clique.
The chairman was in the Herald several days ago talking about the need to reconnect with the community. That goes beyond sending players to primary schools. You want 20k members and a bulging sponsorship portfolio, get a genuinely competitive team.
If you want 10k members and limited sponsors, keep heading down this path. It's really simple.
As nice a sentiment it is to have rise for Alex on the jersey, the reason it's there is because we don't have a sponsor interested in that spot.
Sometimes the reality isn't nice but it's still the reality.
The 'Rise For Alex' spot is actually for the deal they cut with Tinkler - he gets the back of the jersey for 4 years for the $1 Million a year we get from him, and he is putting Rise For Alex on it instead of whatever hairbrained scheme he has running...
Swarzey, I wish it was different but frankly, it ain't and hoping it will fix itself it's helpful.
Right now there isn't a single voice of reality in that club.
It's run like a family business and typically they are the last to embrace change irrespective of whether their very future depends on it.
I am dealing with exactly that at the moment, I am trying to save a family business from itself and unfortunately tough calls need to be made and hiding from them doesn't make it easier.
The board are supposed to be the adults in this instance but no one seems to want to take Stone aside and give him the facts of the matter.
Just look at recruitment, we've signed Sione and his brothers, but don't know where to play them, we've signed Gagai but can't get him the ball, it seems that we'll happily sign Gids if he decides he wants to play, we've lost Scott, Smith is fading fast and one of the next signing priorities is Mamo? How many outside backs do we really need? We've had a deficiency in the front row for 5 plus years and zero movement in that area, in 2016 the only back rower worth feeding will be Rochow, so we get ready to sign another outside back.
In all seriousness, where the **** is the recruitment strategy.
Additionally, the Gids situation is a joke, he shouldn't be making that decision, irrespective of how many games he played for the club. Today somebody should be telling him it's time.
We've had three change agents at the club, Ryan and Smith got driven out by vested interests to the long term detrement of the club and I actually think that Bennett eventually realised that it was a basket case and just decided to move on.
In the case of the coach, we didn't take the brave option and bring in new blood, we again took the soft option.
Doesn't anyone aspire to winning a comp anymore, don't you?
If we do, we just can't keep making the same mistakes every single year, and we just can't keep recycling insiders because they are in the clique.
The chairman was in the Herald several days ago talking about the need to reconnect with the community. That goes beyond sending players to primary schools. You want 20k members and a bulging sponsorship portfolio, get a genuinely competitive team.
If you want 10k members and limited sponsors, keep heading down this path. It's really simple.
As nice a sentiment it is to have rise for Alex on the jersey, the reason it's there is because we don't have a sponsor interested in that spot.
Sometimes the reality isn't nice but it's still the reality.