TheFrog
Coach
- Messages
- 14,300
JWH seems like the man. Disguises a shoulder charge well, even when jaws are broken.I look forward to Slaters reaction should he cop a shoulder in his last game.
JWH seems like the man. Disguises a shoulder charge well, even when jaws are broken.I look forward to Slaters reaction should he cop a shoulder in his last game.
By taking the same early guilty plea option that any other player is afforded?So somewhere between 2008 and 2010 he was awarded "Protected Species" status
Slaters judiciary record.
*2005 Contrary conduct (head slam) grade 2, early plea. Suspended 1 week
*2006 kicking, grade 5, guilty at panel, suspended 7 weeks.
*2006 dangerous throw, grade 1, guilty at panel, suspended 2 weeks
*2006 striking, grade 1, guilty early plea, suspended 2 weeks.
*2008 contrary conduct (fighting) grade 2, guilty at panel, suspended 1 week.
*2010 dangerous conduct (legs/feet) grade 1 guilty early plea, suspended 0 weeks.
*2010 careless high tackle, grade 1, guilty early plea, suspended 0 weeks.
*2013 dangerous conduct, grade 1, guilty early plea, suspended 0 weeks.
*2018 shoulder charge, grade 1, not guilty at panel, suspended 0 weeks.
Isn't it wonderful to see a decision which upsets all the right people - the whingers, wallys and wankers.
Can't wait to see Paul Gallen's reaction, nobody does sandy vag like that bloke.
Pretty sure in 2010 he he would have pleaded not guilty for the panel to have found him guilty.Of 9 charges, only once (2018) did he plead not guilty.
Pretty rich considering Gallen has already been notably vocal on the topic, and you can't seem to go 3 posts without exposing the giant blue chip on your shoulder.Gallen isn't even related to the topic and the inbreeds need to bring him up.
NRL is not Rugby League.NRL reports on the goings on at clubs as if it is a tv mini series, secretly they like it. I'm sure they believe any exposure is good exposure, that couldn't be less true.
It's absurd that the one game I know most about due to playing it entire life, watching it whole life, supporting it my whole is the one game I would never place a single dollar on because I know the game will be decided more often than, not by the players, but by the hidden agenda the NRL / media agreed on.
I really hope everyones see how much of a coincidence it is not that the storm and roosters are playing each other when its slaters final year, up against his old mate cronk. The refereeing in the finals series was so one sided, only 2 teams were ever going through to the GF.
"Pretty sure'' was used in Slaters defense on Tuesday night wasn't it?Pretty sure in 2010 he he would have pleaded not guilty for the panel to have found him guilty.
So compared to Andrew Fifita, its not that bad.
Gallen isn't even related to the topic and the inbreeds need to bring him up.
Shouldn't you be at Steiner today?
Slaters judiciary record.
*2005 Contrary conduct (head slam) grade 2, early plea. Suspended 1 week
*2006 kicking, grade 5, guilty at panel, suspended 7 weeks.
*2006 dangerous throw, grade 1, guilty at panel, suspended 2 weeks
*2006 striking, grade 1, guilty early plea, suspended 2 weeks.
*2008 contrary conduct (fighting) grade 2, guilty at panel, suspended 1 week.
*2010 dangerous conduct (legs/feet) grade 1 guilty early plea, suspended 0 weeks.
*2010 careless high tackle, grade 1, guilty early plea, suspended 0 weeks.
*2013 dangerous conduct, grade 1, guilty early plea, suspended 0 weeks.
*2018 shoulder charge, grade 1, not guilty at panel, suspended 0 weeks.
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaWhat’s his record got to do with whether he was charged for a shoulder charge?? Match review thought it was a shoulder charge. Nrl judiciary reviewed the evidence and determined (for various reasons) it was not a shoulder charge.
How obsessed are you with this? It’s pretty clear the ref made the wrong call. As did the match review panel. Nothing wrong with the rule either. If anything, the NRL judiciary has proved the system works. In the end the correct decision was made.
You should be praising Billy. After all, had he not had a season ending shoulder injury in 2016, your club wouldn’t have had a chance in hell of winning its first premiership. Only reason storm lost that GF was cause it’s most influential attacking player was on the side lines
What’s his record got to do with whether he was charged for a shoulder charge?? Match review thought it was a shoulder charge. Nrl judiciary reviewed the evidence and determined (for various reasons) it was not a shoulder charge.
How obsessed are you with this? It’s pretty clear the ref made the wrong call. As did the match review panel. Nothing wrong with the rule either. If anything, the NRL judiciary has proved the system works. In the end the correct decision was made.
You should be praising Billy. After all, had he not had a season ending shoulder injury in 2016, your club wouldn’t have had a chance in hell of winning its first premiership. Only reason storm lost that GF was cause it’s most influential attacking player was on the side lines