myrrh ken
First Grade
- Messages
- 9,817
Did GI have a contract with Broncos?
It's not the way he should have acted but it's not the same situation is it?
Probably more like Big Sammy who walked out on his contract with Bath with 2 years to go.
Did GI have a contract with Broncos?
It's not the way he should have acted but it's not the same situation is it?
Did GI have a contract with Broncos?
It's not the way he should have acted but it's not the same situation is it?
Would there be a case for restraint of earning?Leeds are pissed at him for saying things about 'being bored every night, on his own looking at the same 4 walls etc' as part of his homesick story - they went out of their way to make sure that wasn't the case and had either players or welfare officers spending plenty of their free time with him to make sure he felt welcomed and part of the club. He also pushed Leeds for a place of his own (he was originally house sharing with Brett Delaney), and Leeds got him a place of his own about 3 weeks before he returned to Aus. So for him then to make out he was left to fend for himself has been a bit of a kick in the guts - hence the being so stubborn. Whoever decided that angle was the way to go on the homesick front is probably responsible for the approach Leeds are taking.
I still think it's BS though - regardless of what he's done, how can Leeds say 'we're not going to pay you, you're not welcome back here to start earning, but we're not going to let you earn anywhere else without a fee' - they're holding him to ransom and that doesn't seem right as he now as no options to earn a living from the game for 2 years, in what is already a short career.
Surely if they're unhappy with his behaviour (not turning up for pre-season), then they sack him and sue him, not just stop paying him but still hold him accountable to the contract duration.
Probably more like Big Sammy who walked out on his contract with Bath with 2 years to go.
Haha
f**k off
He is as much a cumt as segeyaro
You mean where Souths repaid the compensation to Bath? Yeah it's just like that.
I don't buy in to the whole home sick, his life is so hard angle either.
It's better than yours.Good argument.
Oh you mean the transfer fee that the NRL decided not to include in the salary cap, yeah that one. Helps to have mates in high places hey? No chance for someone like Seg.
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/...t-of-israel-folau-fiasco-20151106-gkssv3.html
So Sammy can miss his mummy even though he's living in a place he grew up, yet Seg can't miss his family. OK
http://au.eurosport.com/rugby-leagu...rd-on-return-to-sydney_sto4986656/story.shtml
It's better than yours.
Sharks would pay if it didn't form part of the cap.
So you do believe Sammy and not Seggy. I gotta congratulate your brain on that.
For what other reason would he be here? No one is going to pay him as much as Leeds were. He hates that butthole of a country.
Leeds are pissed at him for saying things about 'being bored every night, on his own looking at the same 4 walls etc' as part of his homesick story - they went out of their way to make sure that wasn't the case and had either players or welfare officers spending plenty of their free time with him to make sure he felt welcomed and part of the club. He also pushed Leeds for a place of his own (he was originally house sharing with Brett Delaney), and Leeds got him a place of his own about 3 weeks before he returned to Aus. So for him then to make out he was left to fend for himself has been a bit of a kick in the guts - hence the being so stubborn. Whoever decided that angle was the way to go on the homesick front is probably responsible for the approach Leeds are taking.
I still think it's BS though - regardless of what he's done, how can Leeds say 'we're not going to pay you, you're not welcome back here to start earning, but we're not going to let you earn anywhere else without a fee' - they're holding him to ransom and that doesn't seem right as he now as no options to earn a living from the game for 2 years, in what is already a short career.
Surely if they're unhappy with his behaviour (not turning up for pre-season), then they sack him and sue him, not just stop paying him but still hold him accountable to the contract duration.
melbourne could have had a crack at Brailey to replace Smith, but instead, chose Smith, who apparently, is a Smith Clone. And he was the 2nd or 3rd best in last years u20's behind Liddle. Perhaps Brailey will turn out great , but rely does the 4th or 5th best in just 1 U20's season kick on.
We need Seg & we will get him. Months to go yet.