- Messages
- 20,182
I know stats aren’t everything, but sometime they do have some relevance.
Manu is getting talked up here, yet it’s been suggested Jennings maybe should be moved on, yet this for this year:
Manu - 12 runs for 105m, 3.1 TB, 0.3 LB, tackle success rate is 85%, 7 tries / 5 TA (played 22 games)
Jennings - 10 runs 95 m, 3.1 TB 0.4 LB, tackle success rate 87%, 9 tries / 3 TA (17 games)
There is stuff all between them (and Jennings has played 5 less games, so probably would have a few more tries / ta), additionally Manu has the benefit of playing with the Roosters and surrounded by better players / spine.
Yet one is star (Manu) and the other is “past it”.
Actually this supports what Pou is saying, players in the top sides get more “notice”.
Manu is getting talked up here, yet it’s been suggested Jennings maybe should be moved on, yet this for this year:
Manu - 12 runs for 105m, 3.1 TB, 0.3 LB, tackle success rate is 85%, 7 tries / 5 TA (played 22 games)
Jennings - 10 runs 95 m, 3.1 TB 0.4 LB, tackle success rate 87%, 9 tries / 3 TA (17 games)
There is stuff all between them (and Jennings has played 5 less games, so probably would have a few more tries / ta), additionally Manu has the benefit of playing with the Roosters and surrounded by better players / spine.
Yet one is star (Manu) and the other is “past it”.
Actually this supports what Pou is saying, players in the top sides get more “notice”.
Last edited: