was Andrew Webster the journo that paid her for the interview?
he was not happy that charges were dropped
he was not happy that charges were dropped
It's even better, isn't it? Because when they drop the charges it means that the prosecution has determined that their case is f**ked? So what outcome do you think is likely if they'd proceeded?Reads like Semi's lawyers were very intimidating in the cross examination.
Dropping charges is not the same as having the charges heard and receiving a not guilty verdict, but well done Semi - you can hopefully bring back your best form for the rest of the season.
Agreed they're not the same. What is also not the same is not being guilty vs being guilty and still being found not guilty. Let the aspersions continue.Dropping charges is not the same as having the charges heard and receiving a not guilty verdict
Of course he's upset, the Yawnion loving Merkin will miss another chance to stick the boot into RL.was Andrew Webster the journo that paid her for the interview?
he was not happy that charges were dropped
Bart is just upset Semi got off, hardly surprising he's been bagging the shit out of him for yonks.It's even better, isn't it? Because when they drop the charges it means that the prosecution has determined that their case is f**ked? So what outcome do you think is likely if they'd proceeded?
The article said the prosecution requested a break to "take advice", which seems code for the witness being in a bad state,and requesting not to continue the character assassination by the defenfents lawyers. Happens too regularly to female alleged victims in DV cases brought to court.It's even better, isn't it? Because when they drop the charges it means that the prosecution has determined that their case is f**ked?
And you can determine all that just from reading one article ?
I would have thought the "taking advice" was more - our case has been exposed like a portugese chicken and we need to talk to the judge (there was no jury in this) and see if he sees any way forward .... and the answer seemed to be no - bye bye
The outcome doesnt say he never did anything - it just says that she appears to have made a concerted effort to get the media and authorities involved to obtain further payment ... hence she came off looking bad and case fell apart .... doesnt mean nothing happened - also doesnt mean something happened
Some people are harder to 'character assassinate' than others. Maybe a lesson about casting stones? But if you're feeling vindictive, dropping your DV case isn't going to help you get revenge. Should've stuck to her guns, unless she realised she didn't actually have any.The article said the prosecution requested a break to "take advice", which seems code for the witness being in a bad state,and requesting not to continue the character assassination by the defenfents lawyers. Happens too regularly to female alleged victims in DV cases brought to court.
And different to a not guilty finding, as sometimes the welfare of people involved is more important than the procedures themselves.
Yes.Is portugese chicken cooked a certain way so that is somehow gets "exposed"? I've never eaten Portuguese chicken.