What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Sharks doing to save themselves , what about Knights?

transporter

Juniors
Messages
57
Cronulla call for partners in bid to save club

CHRIS BARRETT

April 21, 2010

CRONULLA officials are set to step up their grand plan to save the embattled club by launching a public campaign for commercial partners in the proposed $110 million development next to Toyota Stadium.
Without the estimated $7m a year it could attract to Cronulla’s coffers the debt-ridden Sharks may go under, club insiders say.
The future of the Sharks has been the subject of constant speculation, with Cronulla Sutherland Leagues Club having an estimated debt of $12m.
The development, which would include 145 apartments for over-55s as well as a hotel, a supermarket and speciality shops, is the cornerstone of the Cronulla board’s goal to shore up the club's future.
The Sharks have spent the past five months working with a property consultancy firm in an effort to complete the details of a package to put to prospective joint venture partners.
That process is almost finalised, the Herald has been told, and the club will soon begin an expressions-of-interest campaign in a bid to attract potential commercial partners to take to members at the next annual general meeting at the end of next month.
The extent of the cash crisis at Cronulla was reignited on Sunday when coach Ricky Stuart said in the wake of a 44-16 loss to Brisbane – the Sharks’ fifth in six games this year – that the club was not spending to the full amount of the $4.1m NRL salary cap.
Sharks chief executive Richard Fisk has since said that the club had in fact cut spending on its NYC and NSW Cup sides, not its top 25 players.
But the clarification has done little to dull the spectre of gloom surrounding Toyota Stadium, where cash previously leaked by the football club – including pay-outs to past coaches Chris Anderson and Stuart Raper – has left the Sharks in a precarious financial position and led to mounting speculation that the club could fold.
Cronulla chairman Damian Irvine would not comment on the Sharks' latest efforts to get the hotel and residential development moving but he has conceded previously that the ambitious project, which received approval from Sutherland Shire Council last August, was not "the panacea to our financial problems".
But unless the development goes ahead, the club’s future is bleak. The development, club sources say, would be irrelevant if the Sharks continued to spend in the unrestrained fashion that landed them in a financial heap.
The new administration, headed by Irvine and Fisk, has made no secret of its mission to alleviate the club’s cash-flow problems since they took over the reins in the Shire.
In their efforts to correct their revenue streams there have been staff cuts, reworking of flawed commercial deals, a vigorous membership drive and cuts to spending on their lower-grade teams.
However, it is acknowledged that it will all come to nothing if the development – on land next to the Sharkies Leagues Club car park – does not attract commercial partners and proceed as planned.
The club has ruled out selling the land in a straight-out fire sale, with the move seen by the board as a short-term fix that would likely keep them afloat for only two to three additional years.
They have 18 months to act on their development application before it expires
 

transporter

Juniors
Messages
57
hey Joker,
just letting everyone know Sharks are in financial trouble just Like knights but their doing something about their problems.
 

Misanthrope

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
47,622
I can see why it's here. We're both clubs struggling for cash, but one of them seems to be trying to do something about it.
 

Haffa

Guest
Messages
16,120
One of those clubs has no assets (other then players) which they can sell and hasn't acquired any assets in the 20 odd years they've been in business, other then a Leagues club which was not worthy of the name which was sold when they realised it was a joke.
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
11,831
hey Joker,
just letting everyone know Sharks are in financial trouble just Like knights but their doing something about their problems.
Our club isn't $12 Million in debt (not talking about retained losses - talking actual debt). They are in a completely different situation to us. Don't drag us down with their rabble.
 

Misanthrope

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
47,622
Our club isn't $12 Million in debt (not talking about retained losses - talking actual debt). They are in a completely different situation to us. Don't drag us down with their rabble.

I do admire their rabble's determination to be better than they are. Apparently being in the NRL was the sole goal of the Knights when they entered the competition.
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
11,831
Chris – spending well beyond your means does not equal “determination”. They have been bailed out more than once, they got their fortune from jumping to Super League and blew all of that cash, they wasted money and paid out contracts that they never should have been in to start off with, and now they are going to be saved by a property development which no bank will touch.

They have stuffed around with the development for so long that they have put themselves in to a position where they have not got enough time to get the development up and running before the DA expires. They want to rush it all now. It’s all too late. In truth the development was all a pipe dream which was never going to be achieved any way.

At least the Knights have been realistic enough to work within our means. Spending millions of dollars you don’t have is not “ambition” or “determination”. It is stupidity. Putting us in the same boat as the Sharks is insulting really. We are better than they are – both on and off the field.
 

Alex28

Coach
Messages
11,831
No it wouldn't. We don't have any assets to use as security to get $12 Million in debt. It will never be us.
 

Latest posts

Top