The Colonel said:
He can be a token selection and a correct selection. For the selectors who have been hounded from pillar to post about the selection they have been found as being correct as his goal kicking seemingly helped in the end.
So you admit that goalkicking made the decision a success. So it wasn't a token gesture at all, was it?
The only way that it could be considered a token gesture is if the selectors didn't think he was the best man for the job but picked him anyway. They obviously took goalkicking into consideration.
If he was good enough for selection in the last game than he should have been good enough for the first two.
I agree. And so do the selectors - they didn't think he was good enough for game 3 until an injury. They got lucky. They should have had him there from game 1. But Bozo loves his fat Manly centre.
Much like his Australian jersey this was just a reward for a long serving player hence it being a token selection as well.
You were in the selection meeting were you? How the f**k do you know why they picked him?
It's much more likely that they thought he was the best option, rather than just throwing out jumpers willy-nilly. The selectors were under just as much pressure as anyone after the first two games. Don't you think that they wanted to pick the squad that they thought had the most chance of winning (hence the lack of blooding rookies en-masse that some people were calling for)?
If he makes game one next year based on form then I'm more than happy for this to be brought up again. Until that happens his selection is nothing more than a token gesture by the NSWRL and selectors which for them paid off.
Quite possibly the stupidest thing I've read on these boards, and that's saying something!
Let's judge whether he was the best man for Origin 3 2007 on whether he is best for the job in 2008?!?!:crazy:
Specialist goalkickers make teams the world over - always have done. Eion Crossan, Ian Herron, Ross Conlon, Joel Caine...... mediocre players who wouldn't have made first grade or representative teams if they weren't good goal kickers. Sure in the end its important but unless the contribute then they are carrying a player for the sake of one skill.
Are you purposely trying to help my argument?
The reason that mediocre players who can kick goals rise above the pack is because it is a valuable skill, which should be taken into consideration in selection rooms. How hard is that to comprehend?
El Masri has more than one skill. Watch the replay and you'll see some pretty good defence.
Thankfully for the selectors they were vindicated in the end.... shame they couldn't have been a little more adventurous in the first few games. I suppose one from three is reasonable odds....
I agree. They should have been more adventurous in the early games. They should have had the guts to not pick Lyon and pick Hazem from the off.
As for alternative selections as wingers first and foremost - Michael Robertson and Chris Hicks, Nathan Merritt, Josh Morris, Adam MacDougall. All in as good if not better form than that of El Masri and would have been just as capable of contributing..... outside of only one area - goalkicking.
Disregarding the fact that your last sentence totally ruins your argument (why would goalkicking not be taken into account), not one of those players is a stand-out. Quite frankly, some of them are laughable (Hicks, a 30 year old of no note who is going overseas next year, Macdougall a has-been, Morris a rookie who has enough on his plate in club games). Merritt is the only one who could challenge, but he has his weaknesses too.
So, given that NONE of them are stand-outs, shouldn't Hazem's goalkicking win it for him?