Elliott's biggest problem, and he's by no means alone in this, is that he likes a very structured gameplan. Talented, ad lib players are basically told to get back in their box and stick to the game plan. Can you honestly tell me that Rhys Wesser has looked anything like he did the last few seasons? Or what about William Zillman this year? In an Elliott gameplan there's no room for someone who seems to pop up all over the field.
Now, that worked for the Raiders of 2003 because all the forwards were in peak, and I mean peak form. Once the forwards started deteriorating, some started leaving and so on, the plan was exposed and Elliott looked completely lost, like he had no idea what to do next. That I suppose is the essential crux of the matter. Coaching defence, he's fantastic at, and an Elliott-coached team will, for the most part, always be in with a chance in most matches. But he has trouble when it comes to attack, something we've seen with the Raiders showing better attack in 12 games than they have in 3 years.
Elliott is a myth, and is being exposed big time.
Despite that, he's not the worst coach in the competition. Chris Anderson, save for one pretty damn good performance, is a moral to take out the title. The Chooks have been woeful for most of the year.